MA Casino Developments

Guaranteed Suffolk will be the GC, on a project of this size it's almost a forgone conclusion - John Fish will line the pockets of whoever he needs to.

But yes, Wynn does everything but the construction in-house
 
Haven't seen anything about this before.

Revere Mayor Looks to Block Critical MBTA Land Sale for Casino Access

October 15, 2014
By Seth.Daniel


Revere Mayor Dan Rizzo has called for the MBTA to stop in its tracks on a land sale to Wynn Resorts – a crucial sale of land that will allow the proposed casino to create an access road on Everett-only land and to avoid troubles with Boston.

Rizzo listed five specific reasons why the MBTA should stop the process, which was announced in public advertisements a little over one month ago.

“The public record concerning this sale indicates that Wynn has not completed the necessary work to evaluate the impacts, the MBTA and MassDOT have reached no conclusion as to the proposal’s impact on transit and rail operations, there has been a woeful lack of public discussion about the sale of valuable public property, public officials and communities interested in expanded rail service to the North Shore have not had an opportunity to review how this sale may impact future service in the region, and the MBTA appears to be violating its own procurement statue,” read the letter.

The letter was sent to the state Department of Transportation (DOT) on Oct. 2, and made public on Oct. 9.

A spokesman for the MBTA said they have received the letter and are reviewing it.

“MassDOT has received the mayor’s letter, and we are reviewing the questions [Mayor Rizzo] has raised,” said MBTA Spokesman Joe Pesaturo. “MassDOT and the MBTA will be providing the (Revere) mayor’s office with a response.”

The MTBA advertised the potential land sale in early September, noting it had received an offer of $6 million from Wynn Resorts for certain parcels of land in and around the MBTA Maintenance Facility on Lower Broadway Everett (Rt. 99). Since that time, the state-mandated process has been underway, with the MBTA soliciting higher and better offers.

Rizzo’s particular concern revolves around what he contends is a plan not only to sell part of the maintenance facility, but also part of the commuter rail right-of-way.

He said one of his major concerns is that there has been no study of how this sale will affect future commuter rail expansion. Revere has long been lobbying for a new commuter rail station at Wonderland Dog Track, which is on the same line – the Newburyport/Rockport line.

“This is of particular concern for me given the need for additional rail service to the North Shore, including the City of Revere, and MassDOT’s proposals to add diesel multiple units on certain lines, including the Newburyport/Rockport line,” he wrote.

Finally, Mayor Rizzo criticized the MBTA for not following its own processes in public procurement. He said the MBTA has shown favoritism in allowing Wynn Resorts the first crack at buying the land.

“It seems to me this procedure is not only inconsistent with [the law], but it also treats Wynn as if it has some sort of property interest in the MBTA’s property, such as a Right of First Offer,” Rizzo wrote. “The MBTA has also demanded payment of 25 percent of the proposed purchase price in case at the time of the submission of the bid…This up front payment requirement will certainly dissuade competing bids, making a sham of the entire procurement process.”

The letter also references Everett public safety officials requesting two means of entrance into the casino site, while the land sale would allow only one entrance.

The Wynn access road via the MBTA land is a vital piece of the project that avoids having to use Horizon Way further down Broadway. Horizon Way shares a city line with Boston via a tiny piece of property that extends northward to that street. Last year, Boston had fought the use of the road and indicated it wanted to be a host community if Wynn used Horizon Way. However, the Gaming Commission threw that out and Wynn had indicated it planned to work out a solution with the MBTA for access via Everett-only land.

Everett Independent
 
Gotta love politics. We didn't win the bid for the casino...so fuck trying to move forward to see what we can do to improve things for our community. Let's just to try to screw up everything for the other guys in hopes that we can ruin their development and later request that the state reopen the bidding process.
 
Gotta love politics. We didn't win the bid for the casino...so fuck trying to move forward to see what we can do to improve things for our community. Let's just to try to screw up everything for the other guys in hopes that we can ruin their development and later request that the state reopen the bidding process.

A Casino is not a good thing for the community. Watch how many Mom and Pop Restaurants and stores shutdown near a 5 mile radius near the casino.

Once your in the casino most people in the community will die in Debt to the Casino compared to spreading their money throughout the community.
 
You're right Rif, the strip club already closed! Who knows what valuable business in lower Everett will be next. The muffler shop? The power plant? The bus garage!?!?

On the other hand, the Suffolk Downs site would have the detrimental effects you site. Although, 5 miles is a serious exaggeration. Its going to effect downtown Boston, Allston, Malden, Cambridge and Brookline? Do you really have such little confidence in the area that you think a single business is going to in effect ruin all of metro Boston? Draw a 5 mile circle.

The best thing about the Everett site is that it's substantially isolated from everything by geography, and is in the middle of an industrial wasteland. It can't really get worse than it already is. If anything it might get better, with some casino workers moving into the vacant buildings in the small residential neighborhood there. There are a few large abandonedish buildings that would be prime for loft conversions.
 
I keep telling myself I won't look at this thread again until November 5, but I am weak.

To me, the headline of this story is "Town that has tons of potential and no creativity is sore loser after other town with little potential and no creativity gets casino."

Revere needs to get its priorities straight. Losing 200 Suffolk Downs employees is a shame, but that area could accommodate thousands of jobs, residents, and shoppers if properly redesigned. It's one (messy-to-redo, but doable) roadway exchange away from the freakin' ocean! Why doesn't anyone punch Revere in the face and say "Dude, people like to live by the ocean! Let's build some nice places to live by the ocean. Let's work on a better street system and a sustainable business model that takes advantage of this beach thing that people drive for hours to get to--but not ours because ours has such a bad reputation. Let's make this a nice place to live rather than double up on dumpyness by fighting over a lost casino bid."

The Everett location by contrast, has no next-best-option. It's brownfields bounded on all sides by more brownfields, across the river from a bus depot, on a sad state highway that goes from one terrible rotary exchange to another. The area has few residents, little business development, and no character. It's possibly the most problematic large parcel in the Boston area.

Can we just let this awful business model flourish in this awful little corner of the Commonwealth? Massachusetts already gambles more per capita than any other state. Give the suckers what they want.
 
To me, the headline of this story is "Town that has tons of potential and no creativity is sore loser after other town with little potential and no creativity gets casino."

Now a sore loser with a lawsuit against the gaming commission.

http://www.wbur.org/2014/10/16/revere-sues-gaming-commission

Revere Sues Gaming Commission Over Casino License Rejection
BOSTON — The city of Revere and a union representing workers at Suffolk Downs are suing the Massachusetts Gaming Commission over the decision to award a casino license to Wynn Resorts in Everett.

The suit accuses the commission of giving Wynn preferential treatment.

It says the commission declined to hold Wynn accountable for meeting job and economic development numbers in its application — one of the company’s key selling points.

Suffolk Downs COO Chip Tuttle is not part of the suit, but he says it makes sense.

“The commission made such an issue of the job creation, how attractive it was,” Tuttle said. “For them to then abdicate that responsibility that they live up to those numbers was stunning.”

A Gaming Commission spokesman says they have not seen the lawsuit, and are holding comment until they do.
 
Where are you getting this from?

That's plausible if you fold in the lottery / Keno. Testable data would be nice, but that's a hypothesis with some merit for further exploration. Culturally this state seems to be semi-defined by the daily line of mindless drones at the packie register to get their quick-picks and cigs.

At least that's my uninformed people-reading insta-snapshot from spending 50/50 of my life on this planet as resident of either Connecticut or Massachusetts and having a state-vs.-state comparison of gas station lines to go on.
 
The Everett location by contrast, has no next-best-option. It's brownfields bounded on all sides by more brownfields, across the river from a bus depot, on a sad state highway that goes from one terrible rotary exchange to another. The area has few residents, little business development, and no character. It's possibly the most problematic large parcel in the Boston area.

To say there are no better options shows the very same lack of imagination you accuse Revere of having - there are plenty of uses for a parcel of this size with the potential access that this one has, both entertainment and otherwise.

MA-99 is problematic - but it's absolutely a solvable problem. Being across the river from a bus depot (but also two Orange Line stations) is a huge potential asset, especially for certain uses that have been discussed to death in other threads. No character and little pre-existing development makes this place a blank slate on which we could paint just about anything if we put our minds to it.

That Wynn has deep pockets doesn't make him the only option for cleaning this site up. He's not even the only option if you want to have an isolating entertainment complex that encourages keeping people in - I'm not a huge fan of the Coney Island theme park model, but we had one once in Wonderland and we could have one again. Or we could have another concert/convention venue. Or we could have an entire planned neighborhood/community a la Westwood Station but with density appropriate for an inner urban area. Or we could have any of the other options for this location that have been discussed here and elsewhere. It doesn't have to be the casino. It NEVER had to be the casino, and painting this as a "Wynn or nothing" dichotomy isn't helpful.

Can we just let this awful business model flourish in this awful little corner of the Commonwealth? Massachusetts already gambles more per capita than any other state. Give the suckers what they want.

You're right, of course, but the problem is that there's only so many times we can slice up this pie into smaller and smaller pieces before we end up with nobody getting enough to eat.

Have you been to Foxwoods recently? Mohegan Sun? Atlantic City? These places all look dire - and not the kind of dire we (here meaning the state) want to see, full of the poor and downtrodden spending money they can't afford to waste. No, these places are another kind of dire - forlorn, mostly abandoned, depressingly empty. Already half of Atlantic City is bankrupt and closing its doors, Foxwoods is desperate to find non-gambling ways to hook a new audience, I don't have the numbers for Twin River - but I can't imagine they're doing much better.

There's only so many suckers in the country and we're already seeing the evidence that the tap is running dry - and you want to spread the crowd even thinner?

Sorry, but I think we can do better than this - on multiple levels.
 
"Give me a 13, 2, 21, no next one over yeah that one, 6, 18, 24, 10, 26, 9 and uhhhhhh......... another 2."
 
It's tough to compare AC & the CT casinos that are in the middle of nowhere to a Boston casino that will be in an urban environment next to a huge population center and easily accessible.

Better comparisons would be to the Harrah's in NO or the new Horseshoe in Baltimore.
 
A Casino is not a good thing for the community. Watch how many Mom and Pop Restaurants and stores shutdown near a 5 mile radius near the casino.

Once your in the casino most people in the community will die in Debt to the Casino compared to spreading their money throughout the community.

I wasn't suggesting the effects of a casino on its surrounding areas are positive. I was saying that the city government clearly wanted to win the casino and instead of moving forward and trying to figure out how to improve their community, they are just bitching about the other city winning.
 
You're right Rif, the strip club already closed! Who knows what valuable business in lower Everett will be next. The muffler shop? The power plant? The bus garage!?!?

On the other hand, the Suffolk Downs site would have the detrimental effects you site. Although, 5 miles is a serious exaggeration. Its going to effect downtown Boston, Allston, Malden, Cambridge and Brookline? Do you really have such little confidence in the area that you think a single business is going to in effect ruin all of metro Boston? Draw a 5 mile circle.

The best thing about the Everett site is that it's substantially isolated from everything by geography, and is in the middle of an industrial wasteland. It can't really get worse than it already is. If anything it might get better, with some casino workers moving into the vacant buildings in the small residential neighborhood there. There are a few large abandonedish buildings that would be prime for loft conversions.


You could be right about the Casino might not even have an effect on this area because of the amount of money already here. So I could be wrong.

So the only real problem is the Traffic Scenario which is a major issue right now. Then factor in a billion dollar casino for the area.
 
Where are you getting this from?

"Massachusetts has a higher percentage of people who gamble than any other state in the union. Most of it has been with the lottery over the years — it’s the richest lottery, I think, in the world — and they drive down to Mohegan Sun, or they drive down to Foxwoods, or they drive down to Rhode Island. So you have a population here that likes to gamble."
http://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2014/10/tumbling-dice/
 
Charlestown’s stake in Wynn game

By Paul McMorrow | GLOBE COLUMNIST OCTOBER 16, 2014

EVER SINCE Steve Wynn proposed building a massive casino on a polluted riverfront lot in Everett, the wrangling over the facility has happened in the abstract. Promises of jobs that exist only on paper have dueled against traffic projections that exist only on paper. But Wynn’s casino won’t exist in the abstract. It’ll exist just over the bridge from Sullivan Square in Charlestown. And now the neighborhood will be part of a looming tug of war over what it will look like in the casino era.

The clock tower and neon signage on the Schrafft’s Center, which housed the old candy factory, are best known as objects sandwiched between Interstate 93 and the Mystic River, as landmarks viewed while sitting in traffic, en route to somewhere else. But both the center, and the Sullivan Square neighborhood it occupies, are about to undergo major reinventions. The factory is about to become a magnet for tech companies that can’t elbow their way into Cambridge’s Kendall Square or Boston’s Seaport district. Sullivan Square, now a tangle of idling cars and parking lots, is poised to become several new city blocks.

If the transformation works, the square becomes Charlestown’s answer to Somerville’s Assembly Square, a wasteland that morphs into a booming new neighborhood because its location is too good to allow it to sit fallow any longer. And if it doesn’t — if the square remains a traffic-choked wilderness sandwiched between Somerville, Everett, and Charlestown — then it will be the fault of the casino.

The square’s rebirth begins at the Schrafft’s Center. Partners HealthCare is moving out to a new campus at Assembly Square. The property’s owner, the Flatley Company, is seizing on the move to renovate the building’s lobby, improve access to the Mystic, and position the property to capture new economy companies that are finding themselves priced out of Cambridge and the Seaport.

Boston has spent years setting the stage for a wholesale reinvention of the neighborhood. There’s not much in Sullivan Square now, but Boston’s plans envision turning it into a destination by downsizing the roadways that now slice through it. The city’s current plans call for slicing traffic lanes off Rutherford Avenue, rebuilding the square’s traffic circle as a tree-lined boulevard, and turning the vacant lots between the Schrafft’s Center and the Sullivan Orange Line station into new homes, offices, shops, and parkland.

Boston wants to transform Sullivan Square from a place commuters cut through to a place residents and companies seek out. But to Wynn, the square is the front door to a casino, a place to move people and cars through on their way to the slot machines.

Two-thirds of the 25,000 daily car trips Wynn’s casino would generate would run through Sullivan Square. Months of bad blood between Wynn’s lawyers and Boston Mayor Marty Walsh stem from the anticipated traffic nightmare and disputes over how to pay for the roads to ease the traffic crunch.

Walsh has fought Wynn tooth and nail since he took office in January, but the game was stacked against him. Casino impact negotiations have treated Sullivan Square as a blank slate that has to be bypassed in the most efficient way possible. It isn’t. Wynn wants to drop a casino next to a neighborhood redevelopment effort that’s been years in the making. It’s an effort that’s about to take off. The worst thing Boston could do now would be to throw it all away, and cut a traffic deal that turns Sullivan Square into the front door to a casino.

Wynn won the state’s lone Boston-area casino license, in part, by agreeing to pay fines for exceeding traffic targets in Sullivan Square. But several hurdles remain. Wynn still faces an arduous state environmental permitting process, in which traffic concerns loom large. Boston should use the state environmental review to lay down a marker for its version of what Sullivan Square should become. Doing so wouldn’t be saying no to Steve Wynn. It would be reaffirming a vision the city has been chasing for years.

Boston Globe
 
Its exciting to think about what Sullivan Sq could eventually become, only one stop down from Assembly, both potentially on an UR route. Not sure what the plans are for now but its basically a blank slate that could be turned into something really nice.
 
Isn't this al for naught is question 3 passes? hope so and already voted for it (absentee), but is there some way Wynn could get around this?
 

Back
Top