MBTA Commuter Rail (Operations, Keolis, & Short Term)

Is there anywhere to see a list of the changes or do I need to open each line’s schedule and new schedule and do a manual side-by-side comparison?
 
They reduced the schedule by 4 round trips, that does seem like a big step in the wrong direction for that line.
My understanding is that this is because of the variety of construction projects underway or about to start (Worcester Union Station / CP-44, Wellesley Square mini-highs, Natick Center [including track relocation], CP-16, I-495/90 interchange, and the Pike projects in Boston). I agree that the midday reductions are not good, but hopefully they are temporary.
 
Mini-high platform installation at West Medford station Sunday. I’ll try to get better photos later this week.
IMG_0920.jpeg
 
My understanding is that this is because of the variety of construction projects underway or about to start (Worcester Union Station / CP-44, Wellesley Square mini-highs, Natick Center [including track relocation], CP-16, I-495/90 interchange, and the Pike projects in Boston). I agree that the midday reductions are not good, but hopefully they are temporary.
Thanks, I was hoping it was something like that. I wonder what type of adjustments will be made when the Pike project gets under way.
 
Just a question for future stations/equipment. If we installed automatic “platform extenders” on coaches, would it allow full high level platforms on lines that can’t have them due to freight clearances?
 
Just a question for future stations/equipment. If we installed automatic “platform extenders” on coaches, would it allow full high level platforms on lines that can’t have them due to freight clearances?
Yes. That's exactly how Brightline does full-highs on a freight clearance route. The platform edges lack a wood bumper edge and the Siemens coaches have platform extenders.
https://www.hsrail.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Brightline_Level_Boarding_Harnish_900x600.jpg


The problem is that you'd have to have an almost-universal fleet of platform-extender rolling stock to really make it work, as cars get scrambled all around the system. It would be a pain-in-the-ass cycling-wise to have strictly Lowell/HaverhillFitchburg/Worcester/Franklin-captive cars while various generations of other rolling stock (EMU or push-pull) are sprayed everywhere else. Enough of a pain-in-the-ass that the one-and-done expense of doing gauntlet tracks where applicable can lick most of the issue.
 
The problem is that you'd have to have an almost-universal fleet of platform-extender rolling stock to really make it work, as cars get scrambled all around the system. It would be a pain-in-the-ass cycling-wise to have strictly Lowell/HaverhillFitchburg/Worcester/Franklin-captive cars while various generations of other rolling stock (EMU or push-pull) are sprayed everywhere else. Enough of a pain-in-the-ass that the one-and-done expense of doing gauntlet tracks where applicable can lick most of the issue.
I thought the whole issue with doing more frequent but shorter consists on the weekends that was discussed in the forums before was that the MBTA particularly likes to keep the same consists assembled and assigned to the same lines most of the time to avoid a lot of yard action? I've been riding the same 4-ish consists every day for months now on Franklin Line trains 705 and 726. The T already sort of operates like this with 67 power door coaches exclusively assigned to the Old Colonies and Pullman BTC-1C and BTC-3 coaches exclusively on the North Side, not that they're incompatible with the rest of the system but they have exclusive assignments and aren't exactly floating around.
 
Franklin Line Double Track project page has received an update displaying some updated timeline elements.
IMG_6516.jpeg

IMG_6517.jpeg

Over a year to finish 1.5mi of track that has largely already been sitting out on ties but with no ballast for years now says to me that they're committing the absolute minimum of resources to this.
 

Back
Top