Hm, any ideas why they decreased the Type 10 order from 165 to 102?
My god, that E Line configuration looks deadly for cyclists. Might as well just put a bounty on them.Making the Green Line more accessible: MBTA looks at complete reconfiguration of the E Line and a new type of station for the B Line
MBTA planners tomorrow will discuss potential new designs for the Green Line along between Brigham Circle and Heath Street and along Commonwealth Avenue with the goal to make the two branches more easily accessible to people with mobility issues. Read more.www.universalhub.com
Im confused, they want to do this where theres already a central median (idiotic) or the section where the tracks are already on the street?
They must be moving the tracks, no? The current tracks run down the middle and share the lane with cars. The little rendering is taken from here btw: https://www.google.com/maps/@42.333...Cd8v9RqOw!2e0!7i16384!8i8192?hl=en&authuser=0So its basically just sidewalk extensions where the stops already are? Thats fine.
So its basically just sidewalk extensions where the stops already are? Thats fine.
I still can't believe that the E line was allowed to operate past Brigham on platform-less stops. Granted I've never seen an incident where a rider was struck by traffic but I have seen cases where cars hurdle through a stopped green line train with doors open and passengers just about to step off.Making the Green Line more accessible: MBTA looks at complete reconfiguration of the E Line and a new type of station for the B Line
MBTA planners tomorrow will discuss potential new designs for the Green Line along between Brigham Circle and Heath Street and along Commonwealth Avenue with the goal to make the two branches more easily accessible to people with mobility issues. Read more.www.universalhub.com
Honestly, the bike lane should be in between the platform and sidewalk.View attachment 14097
What I see in this rendering (E Line street running) is moving the tracks to the outside lane; narrow unprotected bike lane between the tracks and car center thru lanes. Looks like death to cyclists time.
This is because the B and C will lag the D and E by several years on all the necessary platform mods for getting the full "Transformation"-level two-car 'stretched' trains. A lot of closeout work has to get scrambled before you can have complete schedules to BC and Cleveland Circle than can open all doors on a supertrain at all stops. It gets doubly dicey on the B when "Comm Ave. Phase III" reconstruction between Packards and Warren is still in design purgatory and they don't even know if the reservation is relocating yet, meaning up to 4 stops have no starting point for design yet. Because of that you'll only be able to run singlet Type 10's on those schedules during the initial deliveries, unlike the deuces (which have the seating and door capacity of Type 7/8/9 triplets) that will debut on the D and E from Day 1. B's and C's will probably be the domain of the Type 9 fleet and any 'best-of-the-rest' residual 7/8's during rush hour, and will slim down to either Type 9 deuces or singlet Type 10's on the off-peak until all platforms get extended.Not sure, but the presentation is up already and notes:
"Options have increased to reflect the new base order quantity"