One cannot debate with someone who invents statistics and ignores evidence.
Never mentioned closing anywhere but Albany. Unclear why you would bring up Cabot or Charlestown.
I agree that well implemented Regional Rail will potentially radically affect the 5xx routes, as well as 57 (and others) This strengthens my argument. A much smaller facility to the west could service the remaining lines as feeders to RR. You are arguing over a dozen busses.
Oh, and the 12 buses on am peak on the 70 could just as easily come from Weston than Charlestown....
Bus lines that run from Brighton Center/Watertown Square to downtown are approximately equidistant to Albany St and Weston (on the Pike). However, one of those is the (near) terminus for the bus routes while the other is entirely non-revenue generating. I could see you arguing for Watertown Square as a replacement instead of Weston for the 501/502/503/504 routes but you're not. Your bias is clear: Redevelop valuable property near the core is most essential. The arguments being placed against you are the following:
-The current trend is to invest in buses and bus lanes, and less for trains for future transit needs in the downtown core.
-
Bus Garage capacity is at maximum it is hurting the bus network. We need more garages instead of just moving them. This is especially true when we consider that we need extra capacity for when rebuilds on aging garages are needed. This is where Montmartre came in. The argument being that a large scale city with an effective transit network does not skimp on transit infrastructure on valuable land lest it hurts the needed transit. You're not going to heavily advocate tearing down fire or police departments to build more buildings in the core.
-
2014 is old data. Albany also has more local routes now: The 4 and 55. It uses 91 buses at AM peak (not really an increase) and stores 130 buses total. So Weston would need to hold all 130 plus additional for future expansion/need.
-Weston to Watertown and Brighton is adding non-revenue generating miles which makes effective capacity less efficient. This applies to the 501-504, 4, 55, 57, 60, 65, 708 (CT3), & 747 (CT2) or according to the 2014 data: 61 buses at AM peak. Again, you are not arguing for Watertown yard reactivation which makes more sense for most of the routes listed.
-F-Line brought up the maxed out capacity of Cabot and Charlestown because the local downtown routes need a home and expansion and your proposal only accommodates 12 buses not because he was implying you said to tear them down. He also discussed how nowhere else inside of 128 (where the local buses are needed) were open to having a garage built.
-On the topic of expansion: With the calls for bus lanes from North Station through to the Seaport, where these additional buses going to be stored if not Albany St.?
Now, I disagree that building in Weston at all is a bad idea and I think you speak to that. Local bus going to commuter rail stops in a regional rail scenario is going to be a future need. Last mile trips are essential to reducing congestion and bus coverage needs expansion. Weston could provide local triage and free up lines such as the 70 and 70A for more capacity at Somerville.
As a side note: this quote was weird:
1 follows Mass Ave. Is Mass Ave Downtown?
Mass Ave. is less than a Mile from the Albany St. Garage. It literally runs through the South End. The #1 Bus uses Albany St. If the argument is that the south end is where the valuable real estate is, why are you trying to discredit the streets and major bus routes in the south end? What a self-defeating defense that was.
