Millennium Tower (Filene's) | 426 Washington Street | Downtown

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Filene's

Filene's Basement closed in September 2007. Demolition started shortly afterwards. I don't understand your claim that construction could have started any sooner.
 
Re: Filene's

FB could have closed sooner and abatement and demolition could have been done much faster. There was no reason as the design was slowed by nitpicking by public authorities.
 
Re: Filene's

Are we being a bit hysterical here? A ninety-day moratorium isn't a death sentence. In that time anything could happen. Let's save the hysteria until February at least...and RIFLEMAN, stop shooting from the hip and antogonizing developers.
 
Re: Filene's

I've never seen a project of this size or even close to this size go through the approval process so fast. Proves it's all about connections. I see nothing wrong with the residential being converted to office, although mixed use is best would have been better.

When the redevelopment of Quincy Market stalled and no local bank would finance the project Mayor White aggressively work to secure the financing. Let's see what Menino can do.
 
Re: Filene's

I don't want to pretend i'm looking at the world through rose colored glasses here, but there are a couple of great examples of projects that had to sit through boom/bust cycles to get built... 111 Huntington, 1 Lincoln, and one of the newest on the skyline, 45 Province. It took the Abbey Group 2 previous cycles to finally get something built. The first time was in the early 90's and they proposed a horrible 13 floor French Second Empire/Po-Mo office building; then the class-A office market went bust. Then they proposed a 16 story tech building in late 90's that looked like a mini version of the new Cira Center in Philly, and the .com market went bust in 2001. Then the residential market was going insane, so we got the tower that is almost completed. I wish i had renderings to show the old proposals, but suffice it to say, we are much better off having waited. That being said, this site is too crucial to downtown to let it sit idle for long.
 
Re: Filene's

Banker & Tradesman - November 10, 2008
Walking Tall?
By Thomas Grillo
Special to Banker & Tradesman


John B. Hynes III, the 50-year-old managing partner of Gale International, is juggling at least three giant commercial real estate pro-jects. In 2001, the Back Bay resident negotiated an agreement with POSCO Engineering & Construction Co. and the City of Incheon, South Korea, for the $30 billion Songdo International Business District. The 1,500-acre city is being built from scratch. Upon completion, it will include 100 million square feet of homes, offices, shops, schools, cultural and government buildings, a 100-acre park, a golf course and a hospital.

Closer to home, the $700 million redevelopment of the Filene?s complex in Downtown Crossing is under construction, and Hynes is in the permitting stages for Seaport Square, the $3 billion waterfront community to be built on 23 acres of parking lots in South Boston.

Banker & Tradesman talked to Hynes before reports surfaced last week that the Filene?s redevelopment was being put on hold for at least 90 days due to a lack of financing.


John B. Hynes III
Company: Gale International
Title: Managing Partner
Age: 50
Experience: 28 Years

Q: Brokers say you don?t have financing for One Franklin (the 39-story office, hotel, retail and condominium project next to a reno-vated Filene?s building). Is that true?

A: It?s half true. Our equity investment group, Gale, Mack-Cali Realty Corp., Vernado Realty Trust and JP Morgan has pledged $300 million. And that money goes into the project first to buy the real estate, relocate Filene?s, remove asbestos, demolition and founda-tion excavation. We spent $150 million and have another $150 million to spend before construction financing gets layered in. Today, we have $300 million committed from Bank of America and Bank of Ireland. We need another $100 million and are talking to five banks. We will get it done.

Q: The Filene?s project went through a quick approval process, in part because there was no neighborhood to object to the office tower?s height. What?s your take on tall buildings in Boston?

A: I live in the Back Bay, and I?m not height-adverse at all unless the height creates canyons like you find on Wall Street and some areas of Manhattan. On the other hand, one of the coolest vistas from the Back Bay/Commonwealth Avenue Mall/Public Garden is to look across Boston Common to the Financial District. To me, that?s a neat look, there?s a sense of place. And if I?m on the Common-wealth Avenue Mall at Dartmouth Street and Comm. Ave., I can see across the John Hancock tower and the Prudential building two blocks away. I don?t find that threatening. I don?t want a 60-story building on Commonwealth Avenue. That?s where I draw the line. And we don?t need to add 20-40-story buildings on Beacon Hill or the South End because that would detract from the overall look, feel and value of what makes those neighborhoods good.

Q: Why is there such controversy when towers are proposed in Boston? Activists often dismiss anything a developer says about height when proposing a building because they say it?s all about making money. What?s your take?

A: Those arguments are so disingenuous. What do those people do? They must be making a living. When some residents oppose a building on those grounds it?s like saying, ?It?s too bad you?re newspaper is making so much money, we don?t want it printed it here.? Everyone who works is making a living. And it?s also disingenuous to say, ?Now that our neighborhood is built out, we don?t want anyone else in.? It?s called growth and opportunity. If a city fails to grow it will die.

Q: Why does real estate get so much attention in Boston?

A: Real estate is a major-league sport in this town. I meet lots of people who know my business who are not in real estate. There is major league coverage too. You can count on the city?s newspapers, the BBJ, Banker & Tradesman, Boston Globe and Herald to have a real estate story daily. Why is that? Real estate projects are controversial because they?re big. The final project impacts the neighbors around it, mostly good, sometimes bad. Every mayor of Boston in the last 50 years has put their imprint on the city in different ways through real estate projects.

Five Things you didn?t know about John Hynes:
1. His father was a newscaster in Boston from 1957 to 2005. His grandfather was mayor from 1950 to 1960.

2. Was drafted in 6th round of ?78 NHL Draft (1st US goalie taken in draft)

3. Married young, so passed on his hockey dream and entered real estate in 1980.

4. Divorced in 2004, and moved to Boston.

5. His first trip out of the country was in 2001 to look at a real estate project in Korea.
 
Re: Filene's

Q: Why is there such controversy when towers are proposed in Boston? Activists often dismiss anything a developer says about height when proposing a building because they say it?s all about making money. What?s your take?

A: Those arguments are so disingenuous. What do those people do? They must be making a living. When some residents oppose a building on those grounds it?s like saying, ?It?s too bad you?re newspaper is making so much money, we don?t want it printed it here.? Everyone who works is making a living. And it?s also disingenuous to say, ?Now that our neighborhood is built out, we don?t want anyone else in.? It?s called growth and opportunity. If a city fails to grow it will die.

Somebody send this to Ned.
 
Re: Filene's

I don't want to pretend i'm looking at the world through rose colored glasses here, but there are a couple of great examples of projects that had to sit through boom/bust cycles to get built... 111 Huntington, 1 Lincoln, and one of the newest on the skyline, 45 Province. It took the Abbey Group 2 previous cycles to finally get something built. The first time was in the early 90's and they proposed a horrible 13 floor French Second Empire/Po-Mo office building; then the class-A office market went bust. Then they proposed a 16 story tech building in late 90's that looked like a mini version of the new Cira Center in Philly, and the .com market went bust in 2001. Then the residential market was going insane, so we got the tower that is almost completed. I wish i had renderings to show the old proposals, but suffice it to say, we are much better off having waited. That being said, this site is too crucial to downtown to let it sit idle for long.
^ look at my "what was proposed and what was built" thread for these renderings
 
Re: Filene's

"A dejected looking Hynes said that the Filene's project has been difficult to 'sell' to the out-of-town banks he's trying to convince to fund the development."

This has been my problem with this developer ever since he launched this failure: his complete inability to sell.

In 2008, no legitimate developer would attempt to sell a landmark, vibrant, mixed-use, pulsating, heart-of-the-city development as "One Franklin" with corporate black and blue colors.

I would guess the bankers took a look at his history of development (none to speak of, One Lincoln/State Street was a political not development job) and then looked at how he was presenting this property (like an office park in Woburn) and consciously or sub-consciously opted against taking the risk.

No developer of a project of this magnitude and attitude would show up at the ICSC with print brochures instead of making some kind of big flashy retail splash.

No developer of a project of this importance to his home town would "roll the dice" on destroying a landmark without having a firmer, more professional grasp on the financing landscape.

But it's the complete lack of branding that is killing me on this project. This should be an epic development, instead we are still calling it "the Filene's tower" - by refusing to define this project, he has let us define it for him.

It's so silly. It's like trying to sell somebody the best filet mignon in a wax paper wrapper with a plastic knife and fork and then complaining that nobody would buy it, and the people who did wouldn't pay $50 for it, only $30.

All that being said, if the market was even just slightly better, we wouldn't be having this discussion - he is a victim of the market, as we all are.

But as predicted, asking for tax money won't be far off. I bet he uses the "rebuilding the MBTA's busiest station" as his public financing angle.
 
Re: Filene's

"One Franklin" has never made sense to me as the name of a project whose primary facades are on Summer and Washington streets. Also, what's this about rebuilding a T station?

I'd think strongly about putting the word "Hub" in the name of any project located here.
 
Re: Filene's

The tower/high rise piece is on Franklin Street, straddling equally Washington and Hawley. The Summer Street portion stays within the existing facade's massing.
 
Re: Filene's

Gonna have to agree with pel on this one. Since location isn't a problem here it all comes down to marketing. That is Trumps genius, he building ugly glass boxes but markets them like no one else can.

I find it sad that so many buildings try to stand out when they need to fall into the background. We finally have a building that should stand out and it is treated "like an office park in Woburn".
 
Re: Filene's

"One Franklin" has never made sense to me as the name of a project whose primary facades are on Summer and Washington streets. Also, what's this about rebuilding a T station?

I'd think strongly about putting the word "Hub" in the name of any project located here.

All 3 lobbies (corporate, residential and hotel) opened onto Franklin street. There were no entrances to the upper building planned for the entire Burnham building, just to the lower retail floors. There were only loading docks planed for Hawley Street. The only other entrance planned was a retail entrance at the "notch" on Washington street where the 2 buildings meet.
 
Re: Filene's

This should be Boston's Time Warner Center, instead it's One Financial Center but not quite even in the Financial District. There's no excitement at all.

Bankers review the numbers, tally the spreadsheet cells, and scrutinize the facts and figures with the left side of their brains... but bankers also have an entire other half of a brain that reacts to this lackluster marketing effort and says "I don't think is gonna work"

Then Mr. Hynes gets quoted saying he can't "sell this project to bankers" - he is ignoring the importance of the right side of the brain... the ethereal, the emotional...

Marketing is much more than pretty ads in the Sunday Globe real estate section - it's how you talk about a project and present it to financiers, the media, government officials... you need a story and "One Franklin" has always been woefully lacking.
 
Re: Filene's

Are we being a bit hysterical here? A ninety-day moratorium isn't a death sentence. In that time anything could happen. Let's save the hysteria until February at least...and RIFLEMAN, stop shooting from the hip and antogonizing developers.


Hey Pal, This is a game, If Mr. Hynes can't finish the project bring on the next developer that CAN. I'm sure it's different when Vornado or Mr Hynes capitalize on another developer's bankrupt project.

Bottom line: times are tough right now and I think they will continue.

BAD TIMING for this project and many other projects in the pipeline.

The market is a disaster and you can BLAME Alan Greenspan.
 
Re: Filene's

Been hunting in northern Maine...no internet. I assume nothing new at Menino Gulch?
 
Re: Filene's

Exotic car racing, huntin'...you a man of all seasons, eh toby?

BTW: Menino Gulch. Nice.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top