...A bit concerned the first level of the facade looks way darker than the golden hued renders. The sunlight does sometimes seems to make it appear more golden, depending on the angle, but on the cloudy days it just appears much much darker than the renders.
Might contrast well with the other buildings. Just concerned that the size and darkness of the facade might be too much in real life.
WTF???
It looks like the material gets lighter as the tower climbs so you're only seeing the darkest hue at the bottom.
What about "noma"/grad school apt tower??
What about "noma"/grad school apt tower??
So worse then? Cool
So worse then? Cool
You mean the facade/architecture... yes, I like the older render. Newer bumpy design is an regrettable change.
Yeah, it sucks. I don't know why, when we have a completely unaffordable neighborhood where all for-profit institutions are building luxury housing, MIT decides that their contribution will be more of, what is effectively, luxury housing. I asked one of the people on the MIT team about this a while back at one of their information / community input things. He dithered between trying to tell me it wasn't luxury housing, explaining it was the only way to make a profit, and just generally not knowing what he was talking about. Those things were a sham anyway - they were never listening to the community, just trying to make it appear as though theywere.
Yeah, it sucks...... they were never listening to the community, just trying to make it appear as though theywere.
More than regrettable, it's a piece of shit, a slabby version of that turd on Mass and Main. If you are gonna say "fuck you" by building another luxury tower at least give us something to look at rather than say "double fuck you...."
it's not like MIT as an institution has any agency or power or influence or money or anything resembling the creative capacity for unique and intelligent thought! We're just slaves to the system like the rest of you all!"