MIT Expansion Plans | MIT/Kendall Square | Cambridge

From Sept 7:

Sloan

P1040240.jpg


P1040241.jpg


Looking east

P1040243.jpg


Sloan, looking northeast from Memorial Drive

P1040244.jpg


Sloan, from Memorial Drive

P1040245.jpg


Media Lab

P1040247.jpg


P1040248.jpg


Atrium?

P1040249.jpg


West facade

P1040250.jpg


P1040251.jpg


NW Graduate Housing

Move-in day (West facade)

P1040258.jpg


East facade (the grill on that gate is formidable.

P1040259.jpg


P1040260.jpg


Inner court, northeast. (The second inner court is to the southwest, and behind the formidable grill gate)

P1040261.jpg
 
Last edited:
I'll post several pics of the rehabbing of One Broadway in the existing development thread later today. They are completely re-doing the base; don't know whether they will replace the skin on the concrete tower.
 
Sloan makes its debut On Broadway:

img2034od6.jpg


(I was driving, so excuse the crappy pics)

img2036tj4.jpg


img2039yy9.jpg


from the north:

img2042rb6.jpg


img2052zb4.jpg


img2062ag9.jpg


img2055kg2.jpg


And the Media Lab addition:

img2063uo8.jpg


img2064pv7.jpg


img2066bd1.jpg


img2067zz4.jpg


img2068ve7.jpg
 
I work in Kendall Square and it is so freaking boring. It's been said before in this thread and I?m sure most of you already realize it. There is literally nothing here and no street life at all. It?s basically an urban office park adjacent to a major university and bio-tech labs with a Starbucks and a Cosi. It seriously needs something interesting, intriguing, a destination, something to make me forget about work for the hour that I have off for lunch.

Lately it?s been so bad that I?ve been taking the T over to Charles and going to Charles Street/the park for my lunch hour. Adding the residences is a good first step, but unfortunately is such a bland, boring area, I don?t think I would want to live here.
With all our supposed planning expertise, how are we regularly able to come up with places like this?
 
Because most of the places worth being in owe little of their attractiveness to planning.
 
So true. It seems there's an inverse equation -- time spent as to quality of result. Shouldn't the amount of time spent on planning mean better results?
 
Sloan School of Management, today:

img8248h.jpg


img8250.jpg


From the Mass Ave. bridge:

img8247.jpg


img8257.jpg


img8259.jpg


img8260.jpg


img8271.jpg


img8272.jpg


img8273k.jpg


img8274d.jpg


And the Media Lab addition:

img8246a.jpg


img8275.jpg


img8276.jpg


img8279.jpg


img8280q.jpg


img8281v.jpg
 
Sloan School, coming along, amidst the depressingly ho-hum Kendal 'skyline':
mit_sloan_expansion.jpg
 
No matter how many buildings they throw up at Kendall/MIT, it remains a barren wasteland. Nothing to do but start all over again. Compare Rotterdam.

My God ... they bombed the wrong city!
 
No matter how many buildings they throw up at Kendall/MIT, it remains a barren wasteland. Nothing to do but start all over again. Compare Rotterdam.

My God ... they bombed the wrong city!

Are you in praise of the rebuilding efforts in Rotterdam? I would assume not.
 
Last edited:
And the Media Lab addition, from several different days:

dscn1991q.jpg


img0135c.jpg


dscn1977.jpg


dscn1978.jpg
 
The glass on the Sloan building looks interesting. Where is the Media Lab again?
 
The Media Lab's in the middle, with Koch at left and Sloan at right

mit2009construction.jpg


The Media Lab has that insubstantial Renzo Piano vibe to it save for the dark grey color, which IMO anchors that corner well and helps it to sympathize with its many 90-year-old neighbors.

dscn1988n.jpg
 
That's sort of how I imagine the FBI building looking.
 
Doesn't seem to matter how much they work on this part of Cambridge, it never gets better.
 
Ugh, what is with this horrific trend of putting up screens or bars over otherwise decent glass buildings? It seems to have spread like wildfire since the completion of the NYT Building.
 

Back
Top