I'll grudgingly agree. It's a good result from a city-sponsored design imperative (from Kairos Shen's reign of incompetence) that we'd do well to migrate away from going forward.
There are some design gestures here that I like, and others I could do without. I'll never get used to seeing them forced into juxtaposition. I've compared this practice to an extortion letter; here's an example composed by a competent writer.
I think it's bad in the way that you can't make an album out of all singles. I'm also on record as not liking many of the individual things being tried here, but smashing them all together does not help at all. The architecture is mostly trash.
I agree that it's good urbanism, if we limit the scope of the term to massing, density, and appropriateness of use.
One of my favorite developments yet! Lovin the angles, the pass throughs, the various colors and textures and design elements, the glass, the nooks and crannies, the lighting, everything. Something new and different to see around every corner.
It's slightly extravagant. Could pass for a shopping mall in Ontario, CA, but falls far short of how egregious it could have been. NO RETARDED alternating window floors, 90 degree cantilevered puke windows, ridiculously proportioned balconies or setbacks.