- Joined
- Sep 15, 2010
- Messages
- 8,894
- Reaction score
- 271
Re: Site in Hub top choice for a soccer stadium
Thanks for pointing this out. This made up criterion is absurd and crafted solely to support their narrative. It's transparent as all hell.
I'll also point out that soccer happens to be the only sport literally the entire world plays, so the fact that MLS isn't the best league in the world with the best players and somehow for that reason, the Revs don't deserve an urban stadium, is also an absolutely batshit crazy argument. Chicago has Fussballgott Bastian Schweinsteiger. LA has fucking Zlatan. DC has Wayne Rooney.
Why would the necessary criterion be whether or not soccer will supersede the Red Sox or Celtics in popularity? What difference does that make? Who decided that four (4!!!!) is the magic number of sports, beyond which we simply must not go?
Thanks for pointing this out. This made up criterion is absurd and crafted solely to support their narrative. It's transparent as all hell.
I'll also point out that soccer happens to be the only sport literally the entire world plays, so the fact that MLS isn't the best league in the world with the best players and somehow for that reason, the Revs don't deserve an urban stadium, is also an absolutely batshit crazy argument. Chicago has Fussballgott Bastian Schweinsteiger. LA has fucking Zlatan. DC has Wayne Rooney.