Call me skeptical, but if they're just building the factory now, how are they going to have any trains finished by 2019?
Rather depends on how much actual work is involved in "final assembly". Remember large amounts of the manufacturing happens in China.
From what I read in CNR's proposal, the only component that's being manufactured in China is the car body shell. The trucks are to be supplied by Bradken, an Australian company; the propulsion system by Mitsubishi; couplers by Wabtec.; etc. Aside from the first 4 pilot vehicles and the car body shells, there actually isn't much manufacturing or assembly being done in China.
Rather depends on how much actual work is involved in "final assembly". Remember large amounts of the manufacturing happens in China.
Kawasaki pretty much did the same thing for the railcars that are in use & still being delivered for the WMATA.
The car bodies are made in Japan, but the final assembly takes place in THIS country.
And BTW, I thought that the building was going to be able to accommodate at least a dozen or more cars for assembly.
Hopefully its just the first building or something, so while they ramp it up, they can be building more buildings for extra capacity.
Call me skeptical, but if they're just building the factory now, how are they going to have any trains finished by 2019?
Hopefully its just the first building or something, so while they ramp it up, they can be building more buildings for extra capacity.
Click here for renderings. The building that's being built now is the main (only?) building. It is scheduled to be complete by April of next year and manufacturing equipment installation is scheduled to be complete by December of next year. Mainstream production of the Orange Line cars should begin immediately after CRRC signs off on the factory, which is scheduled for April of 2018.
In the site plan rendering, there is what looks to be an outline of a potential second building for additional production capacity.
The Chinese company making Boston and Chicago’s new subway cars has big problems in Singapore
WRITTEN BY Heather Timmons | Echo Huang Yinyin
July 06, 2016
Chinese train manufacturer CSR Sifang has run into serious quality problems in a major project in Singapore. The city-state’s transportation authority said cracks have appeared in dozens of train cars made by CSR Sifang, where the cars attach to the “bogie” or undercarriage.
Twenty six out of 35 railcars made by a joint venture between CSR Sifang and Kawasaki Heavy Industries have defects, Singapore’s SMRT Trains said Tuesday (July 5).
The Singapore government’s announcement comes after Hong Kong news agency FactWire reported that trains were being sent back from Singapore to CSR Sifang’s factory in Qingdao, China, for replacement. The crowd-funded news organization tracked cars, shrouded in green wrapping, from Singapore’s Bishan Depot to a Singapore port to Qingdao.
CSR-made trains have experienced a series of problems in Singapore, from exploding batteries to cracked passenger windows, FactWire reported, citing sources in Singapore and mainland China. Kawasaki was responsible for overseeing and designing the trains, and making the train bogies, while CSR Sifang, part of China’s state-owned train giant CRRC, was responsible for the cars.
FactWire reports:
The mainland railway industry source stated that quality issues with the Chinese-made C151A trains began to worsen in 2013. They said cracks were found in structural components, including the sub-floor – a compartment under the passenger floor holding the equipment box and electrical wires – and bolster function parts connecting the car body to the bogie, the latter having the most serious problems. “It’s a structural problem,” said the source. “The bolster function balances the train’s weight and swing range, [therefore] cracks are dynamic, [they] can spread to the train car body with the bolster function, so the entire train car must be replaced.”
Full article: http://qz.com/724156/the-chinese-co...ew-subway-cars-has-big-problems-in-singapore/
Oh boy...
Gee... almost makes you wonder if going for the bid that was $300M below all the others wasn't smart.
As far as I can tell, though, the siloed nature of railcar procurement means that Singapore's and Boston's vehicles may as well have been developed by different companies. The question is whether SMRT, the CTA, and the MBTA share the components that have failed...
Also, this could turn out like Hyundai Rotem - once they get rolling, they work out the flaws, and some other agency had to suffer the headaches.
EDIT: Reading between the lines in the Quartz piece, it sounds like the structural problems may be tied to the relationship between Kawasaki and CSR. CSR is doing everything for the MBTA order.
The Singapore cars were built by CSR. CNR and CSR both bid on the MBTA order. CNR won the order, CSR was disqualified for not meeting the specification. CNR and CSR have since been merged to form CRRC. It remains the CNR plant in China that will be building the shells for the MBTA order.
Thanks! I knew the abbreviations weren't quite matching up. I couldn't understand the relationship between CNR, CSR & CRRC.