It should be knocked down and replaced with a tied arch bridge. You could have this all done in a week.Unpopular opinion: the Northern Avenue Bridge was ugly the day it was built. No idea why so much importance is attached to preserving it.
It should be knocked down and replaced with a tied arch bridge. You could have this all done in a week.
It should be knocked down and replaced with a tied arch bridge. You could have this all done in a week.
Agree 100%. It would be cheap, easy to float in and jack up into place, and it would look good too. Win win win.
Every other bridge across the channel (Seaport BLVD, Congress, Summer) is inoperable or was built fixed. Unless there’s something special on the block between Northern and Seaport it shouldn’t make a difference. I like having something there for the pedestrian experience but I agree, scrap it all and build it into the new dam/gates with a simple fixed structure
Maybe now would be a good time to start talking about a big barrier…Boston's highest high water is 15.16 feet. From the graphic, the gates would apparently protect against a crest of 15.5 feet. Not much margin, unless the bridge deck provides an additional 2-3 feet, which might explain the chunky blocks instead of svelte piers. (That said, I did not check the crest height for the option, which probably can be found in the engineering drawings.)
Below is the base concept for the barrier. Combining the barrier with a new Northern Avenue bridge is the alternate. Pick your poison
Engineering drawings for both can be found here.
https://www.bwsc.org/news-and-events/news/coastal-stormwater-discharge-analysis-project
^^^ Go to Fort Point
I like the location of the proposed pedestrian bridge, further north than the old Northern Ave bridge. The proposed location would provide a shorter and more direct pedestrian and bike route from the Downtown waterfront to the Seaport waterfront.Boston's highest high water is 15.16 feet. From the graphic, the gates would apparently protect against a crest of 15.5 feet. Not much margin, unless the bridge deck provides an additional 2-3 feet, which might explain the chunky blocks instead of svelte piers. (That said, I did not check the crest height for the option, which probably can be found in the engineering drawings.)
Below is the base concept for the barrier. Combining the barrier with a new Northern Avenue bridge is the alternate. Pick your poison
Engineering drawings for both can be found here.
https://www.bwsc.org/news-and-events/news/coastal-stormwater-discharge-analysis-project
^^^ Go to Fort Point
You said why in your first sentence. They went pure bike/ped. Low cost and focused. They cut down the number of cooks in the kitchen. We try for bike/ped/bus/emergency vehicle/park, scenic overlook, historic recreation.... We end up with a Frankenstein's monster of a design.I visited Des Moines Iowa, and, I gotta say, their ability to build dramatic,functional bike-ped-only bridges seems several levels above Boston's game.
Downtown Rehabbing a rail bridge into bike/ped:
Des Moines Union Railway Bridge (south crossing for the downtown riverwalk)
Pedestrian Bridge HDR - Des Moines, Iowa (Project 50/50 - Week 16) by Jason Mrachina, on Flickr
Iowa Women of Achievement Bridge: single-arch, double-bikeway bridge (north crossing for the downtown riverwalk)
44th Street bridge (two arch, single ROW) (over interstate on its approach to downtown)
View attachment 35073
How does Des Moines pull this off and not Boston?
I'd be thrilled to get off-the-shelf derivatives of either of these arch bridges.