- Joined
- Dec 10, 2011
- Messages
- 5,599
- Reaction score
- 2,710
From 2009:Do we have any data on which sections of the NEC (or in general) are the most congested?
From 2009:Do we have any data on which sections of the NEC (or in general) are the most congested?
The article says the new cars "would run on routes like the California Zephyr between Chicago and San Francisco and the Cardinal between New York and Chicago". Does that mean they're looking at replacing both the single-deck and double-deck fleet, or did the article get it wrong?
The article says the new cars "would run on routes like the California Zephyr between Chicago and San Francisco and the Cardinal between New York and Chicago". Does that mean they're looking at replacing both the single-deck and double-deck fleet, or did the article get it wrong?
[yanked from other thread]
The article says the new cars "would run on routes like the California Zephyr between Chicago and San Francisco and the Cardinal between New York and Chicago". Does that mean they're looking at replacing both the single-deck and double-deck fleet, or did the article get it wrong?
Amtrak, as of late, has ordered tons of new equipment, ranging from the brand new Acelas, to Chicago passenger cars to the latest order. which is the new Airo equipment for the NEC, Downeaster & other routes, so it can be quite confusing as to where & how to post the info. Hopefully, & maybe, the mods can come up with an idea on where & how to post things, & in what category. Could any of the mods please look into this? Thanks.
At least the T hasn't screwed up like this: https://jalopnik.com/spain-s-new-275-million-trains-are-too-big-for-its-t-1850144827
Didn't the French do something similar about 10 years ago for a much bigger order of like $20B and 2000 trains, and only found out after they took delivery of the first few hundred? If I recall correctly, they hadnt measured old station platforms, only more recently built ones and they had to modify something like 1500 platforms.While this is indeed a big screw-up, a more accurate headline for that article was that the DESIGNS are for trains that are too big for the tunnels. There are no trains yet. It's still a costly mistake due to the design rework required, though.
Didn't the French do something similar about 10 years ago for a much bigger order of like $20B and 2000 trains, and only found out after they took delivery of the first few hundred? If I recall correctly, they hadnt measured old station platforms, only more recently built ones and they had to modify something like 1500 platforms.
Didn't the French do something similar about 10 years ago for a much bigger order of like $20B and 2000 trains, and only found out after they took delivery of the first few hundred? If I recall correctly, they hadnt measured old station platforms, only more recently built ones and they had to modify something like 1500 platforms.
East Side Access got over halfway there.While I generally am not a fan of government waste, I only wish we were in a position to have some egg on our faces resulting from a $20B passenger rail investment.
feeling a bit spicy there eh?East Side Access got over halfway there.
The map comparison between what we have now and what was lost is pretty stark.The Federal Railroad Administration recently released its study of long distance rail routes. The slide deck is huge but very interesting
This is required by the IIJA to evaluate former routes for potential restoration. No impact on New England but a pretty fascinating study.Meeting Materials
Meeting Materials FRA is engaging with State DOTs, Amtrak, Class I Railroads, metropolitan planning organizations, regional passenger rail authorities, local officials, federally recognized tribes, and the broader stakeholder community as we evaluate how to better connect people with...fralongdistancerailstudy.org