P
Patrick
Guest
That was just my cynicism concerning our auto-dependent culture and how I don't think we should build our lives (or our pedestrian walkways) based on the preferences of automobiles. I'll try to tone it down
I also concur that a non-cloverleaf interchange would be better for pedestrian AND automobile traffic. This interchange is where the 'gateway to the peninsula' should be. Great spot for urban development.
No! don't tone it down...don't misunderstand me, I think that is precisely the type of attitude smart urban planning should be based around, however, I guess I just misunderstood you because from my frame of reference I was assuming any "solution" would take the interchange as a "given" seeing as how its already in place. I think going forward we should take your attitude, but the fact is that it would take more than anyone around here would be politically willing to invest to get rid of the interstate barrier to downtown. Not only that, but don't forget that for all of its shortcomings, the interstate enlivened downtown portland when it was crumbling. people need to keep things in perspective a bit. Portland was town past its prime and the old port was a no-go zone where only bums and crooks hungout. the infrastructure was crumbling, congress street was a mess, the city had emptied out and there were no office towers, no arts district, no civic center, etc. The place was an absolute dump. the interstate and franklin arterial, as well as spring street, changes this by enabling the feasibility of monument square, which used to be referred to as the "golden triangle" because of all its potential (it used to be a parking lot). spring street enabled the civic center, which further fed tourists into the old port. the old port has increased interest in the eastern waterfront and parts of congress street heading up the hill, and it is only because of these things, as well as the fact that cars come into the city by the interstate that everyone now despises that there is even interest in bayside or reconfiguring franklin arterial in the first place. So, while I certainly wish the city could be as nice as it is without these blunders, they also serve legitimate purposes which will have to be solved via alternative transportation (rail) if they are to succeed. This, in turn, requires a major shift in attitudes throughout the metropolitan region. assume we fixed the arterial, took otu the interstate, and put in rail. people may just opt to pass portland by for scarborough sprawl. it is a delicate balance that must be achieved and now I have yet again gone on a long rant.
also check out this blog which I think most on here would like (corey im not sure if this is on your list of linked to sites or not) http://themaineland.blogspot.com/