For some reason I feel... itchy looking at this..An early concept for Brigham & Women’s Hospital.
An early concept for Brigham & Women’s Hospital.
Wasn't there a small tower with the same style in Chicago or NYC recently demolished (last 2-3 years)? Same architect?
An early concept for Brigham & Women’s Hospital.
You have trypophobia like meFor some reason I feel... itchy looking at this..
The routes are from the Master Highway Plan - 1948 - For The Metropolitan Boston Area. I've known about it since about 1971, and downloaded it a few years ago from https://archive.org/details/masterhighwaypla00char/mode/2upWhat exactly is this based on? I've never seen these routes before.
The routes are from the Master Highway Plan - 1948 - For The Metropolitan Boston Area. I've known about it since about 1971, and downloaded it a few years ago from https://archive.org/details/masterhighwaypla00char/mode/2up
It's a fascinating read. This was the first comprehensive expressway system proposed for the metropolitan Boston Expressway system. From 1948 to 1956 isn't a long time, but the routes changed dramatically, especially I-93 north through Medford and Stoneham, the (unbuilt) Northwest Expressway (Route 2 through Cambridge), and the (unbuilt) Inner Belt Expressway. The final expressway routes planned by 1969 were far superior to these 1948 routes in my opinion. The 1969 routes tried to avoid neighborhoods as much as possible, whereas the 1948 routes plowed straight through the middle of many of them.
The 1948 routes were shaped by a different time in which heavy industry and railroad lines and yards were dominant, and thus were pretty much avoided by the 1948 routes; probably a legacy from WW II in which the nation was heavily dependant on these. By 1969, the planned expressway routes were shifted over to the declining railroad yards and industrial properties.
The irony of these many expressway plans and designs over a 3 decade span was that only a fraction of them actually got built. I regret that in some ways, looking at the gridlock we deal with today (COVID-19 reduced traffic aside, of course). But metro Boston would have been far more sprawling with a decimated core if all of these had been built. So I can see both sides.
It's a fascinating read.
A comprehensive plan for improvement of the transit system is contained in the two reports by the Metropolitan Transit Recess Commission dated April 1945 and April 1947. It is assumed that this program, in essential the form and to the extend recommended, will be carried out. If rapid transit facilities are not extended and improved, the system of expressways recommended will be inadequate to handle the volumes of traffic that will be generated in the outer and rapidly growing portions of the metropolitan district.
lots of left lane entrances and exits on the highways around hartford from the unbuilt sections, which are awful. but it did bring some interesting stuff like the 4 stack interchange with half of the ramps unusedYou know...like this utterly insane Greater Hartford planning map from 1963 just screams "PANIC!" at the top of its lungs rather than represent something even anyone at the time thought could coherently function.
But Connecticut was the epicenter of NYNH&H's collapse. It had the rail monopoly in the state, was so bankrupt it couldn't repair any of its washouts from the 1955 hurricanes that shredded in-state movements, and the state couldn't do anything about it because that was all behind a federal paywall. So this is what the ConnDOT map started looking like when they were grasping at straws at an imminent future of total modal singularity. And the roads infamously don't work at all today because planning became contingent on most/all of those spurs being built in total hands-joining tandem to keep the spines above water. "Pull a Conrail 20 years early" definitely would've changed CT's trajectory to present, maybe to more unrecognizable degree than MA. But, alas, that's "Earth Three" alternate universes for you. . .
For whatever reason, Connecticut was huge into left-hand expressway exits and complex interchanges in the 60's and 70's. Unlike Massachusetts, which pretty much stayed with traditional cloverleaf interchanges.lots of left lane entrances and exits on the highways around hartford from the unbuilt sections, which are awful. but it did bring some interesting stuff like the 4 stack interchange with half of the ramps unused
Here's a link the Metropolitan Transit Recess Commission doc: https://archive.org/details/reportofmetropol00mass_1/page/14/mode/2up. Clearly the transit and highway plans were made to complement each other to some degree.
Fantastic. Thank you for the link. I hadn't seen this one. Amazing read.
lots of left lane entrances and exits on the highways around hartford from the unbuilt sections, which are awful. but it did bring some interesting stuff like the 4 stack interchange with half of the ramps unused