Providence developments

Plans Approved for Parcels 14 & 15 in I-195 Redevelopment District​

“The I-195 Redevelopment District Commission has approved CV Properties's plans for parcels 14 and 15 in Providence. The first phase of the project will include a primarily residential building with 183 units and ground-floor retail space. Units will be a mix of studio, 1 & 2 bedrooms.”

parcel 14


https://www.bldup.com/posts/plans-approved-for-parcels-14-15-in-i-195-redevelopment-district
 

Plans Approved for Parcels 14 & 15 in I-195 Redevelopment District​

“The I-195 Redevelopment District Commission has approved CV Properties's plans for parcels 14 and 15 in Providence. The first phase of the project will include a primarily residential building with 183 units and ground-floor retail space. Units will be a mix of studio, 1 & 2 bedrooms.”

parcel 14


https://www.bldup.com/posts/plans-approved-for-parcels-14-15-in-i-195-redevelopment-district
There is a thread for this development. Dyer Wharf | I-195 District | Providence
 
Not sure if this deserves its own thread:


This description of the plan doesn't make it sound very ambitious:

One of the plan’s central strategies is to increase the housing supply by reclassifying various residential zones to allow for higher-density developments. Areas currently zoned as R-2, which permit only single-family homes and duplexes, are proposed to be up-zoned to R-3, allowing for single, two-, and three-family homes by right, and small apartment buildings via a special use permit process. Additionally, C-1 areas are being reclassified to C-2, transforming current commercial zones and paving the way for larger developments, including retail and office spaces. Single-family zones in College Hill and on Blackstone Boulevard will now be mandated, via state law, to accommodate more density via accessory dwelling units (ADUs).
 
Nine proposals for Parcel 5 in 195. Lots to look at! https://www.195district.com/documents/

Lots of good options in there, and even the boring ones are inoffensive and would still be nice.

My favorite is the Bluedog Capital proposal. Greylock's and Transom's are great too. The Design Center Partner's proposal is kind of crazy but if the materials are right it would be the type of fun, whimsical architecture Providence (and Boston) could use more of. Dunno about those roof slope angles and snow though...

Also, in slide 15 of the EQT Exeter proposal, what city is rendered in the background?
 
Lots of good options in there, and even the boring ones are inoffensive and would still be nice.

My favorite is the Bluedog Capital proposal. Greylock's and Transom's are great too. The Design Center Partner's proposal is kind of crazy but if the materials are right it would be the type of fun, whimsical architecture Providence (and Boston) could use more of. Dunno about those roof slope angles and snow though...

Also, in slide 15 of the EQT Exeter proposal, what city is rendered in the background?
I don't think that's a real city, but rather a rendering of South Water St looking towards an imaginary downtown Providence.
 

Legally bland: Why Providence's much-needed new housing looks ugly, and can it be fixed? https://www.providencejournal.com/s...ugly-is-design-review-the-answer/75397124007/


This part is what I was waiting for and stands out the most:

“Kallfelz, whose firm designed some of the state's income-restricted housing developments, said you can still build elegant, cost-effective buildings that are up to four stories tall by focusing on the basics – traditional proportions, simple siding materials and nice trim details.

The problem is that developers and architects often don't do that "because it’s seen as not being inventive," he said. There's often a desire for podium buildings, in particular, to look unique and different, he added.”

-I’m not sure when architects and developers decided that after cost (building as cheaply as possible) the next most important thing is that a building needs to stand out. It doesnt make any sense and its destroying the character of our cities and making people turn against development in general. When every building is trying to stand out and be different than the rest you end up with a bunch of competing and contrasting styles that clash and look like shit. People dont like this, so why do they keep insisting on ramming it down everybodys throat?

There needs to be wayyyyy more importance placed on blending in to the existing neighborhood and enhancing whats already there. As others have put it “vernacular architecture”. As mentioned above building elegantly doesnt mean building expensively, it means using proportionality, symmetry, colors that match well with the existing neighborhood, and design elements that also match. Building an orange, lime green, yellow, and black square with colors checker-boarded all over the place definitely stands out, but it detracts from the overall neighborhood. Theres nothing wrong with blending in and actually it should be the main goal. A neighborhood like the back bay isnt great because every single building is unique and completely different from the next, its great because they picked a style that people like and stuck to it over and over and over. Its not hard, I swear these people are idiots these days. Modern architects are the only ones who like this crap and insist that they know better than everyyyyyyyone else who is saying no actually this sucks.
 
 


Opportunity! With the mall needing to innovate, if done with some heart and thought, this is an interesting chance to develop from the mall to eagle street with dense mixed use developments while keeping some of the metal arts in that area. There is also redevelopment plans around the river in this area. Potentially this could open up a giant area of PVD to be developed.

 
Big changes are coming to Trinity Repertory Company.


With a $35 million overhaul of their five-story, Beaux-Arts-style theater underway, Trinity Rep leaders believe the company will be elevated to a new level — marked by what Artistic Director Curt Columbus calls “an incredibly broad reach and long-lasting impact.”
 

Attachments

  • 467456353_120215088733560612_6378668006577728291_n.jpg
    467456353_120215088733560612_6378668006577728291_n.jpg
    53.5 KB · Views: 13

Back
Top