atlantaden
Senior Member
- Joined
- May 31, 2006
- Messages
- 2,594
- Reaction score
- 2,692
One park each for the North End, Waterfront, and Chinatown. Everything else should have been housing (I'd even bump up the affordable component to 25%). Now what Neighborhood could argue with that? Weren't 20,000 residents displaced from this area? Stringing together 15 vacant lots does nothing for our city.
TC, I agree with everything you say cept for "Now what neighborhood could argue with that? Actually, each of the above neighborhoods (along with many others) regularly raise hell when new developments are proposed for their area, including housing. I think Parcel 24 in Chinatown is one of the few large housing developments that has the support of the community. Low to Midrise housing with retail on the street level, with pocket parks spaced around would have been perfect for many parts of the Greenway but those ideas were doomed from the start! Hopefully, the YMCA, History Museum, and the New Museum will fill in some of the gaps.
TC, I agree with everything you say cept for "Now what neighborhood could argue with that? Actually, each of the above neighborhoods (along with many others) regularly raise hell when new developments are proposed for their area, including housing. I think Parcel 24 in Chinatown is one of the few large housing developments that has the support of the community. Low to Midrise housing with retail on the street level, with pocket parks spaced around would have been perfect for many parts of the Greenway but those ideas were doomed from the start! Hopefully, the YMCA, History Museum, and the New Museum will fill in some of the gaps.