Nobody that actually matters gives a shit about how tall the buildings in your city are.
Then why are cities around the world still building them?
Tangent: There’s a really nice book about the impact of zoning choices in NYC/Chicago on their respective skylines. It’s called Form Follows Finance.
I almost wish the building would stay un-cladded like that. It is all the more impressive to see each and every steel level looming over the West End and the round shape means it looks like nothing else under construction Boston right now (or ever, to my knowledge).
Also, right now on the CTBUH the Hancock is ranked 631st. On SSC they have a section called Rate Our Talls with threads for every building in the world >250 meters. You go through pages and pages of random Chinese boxes and Boston never appears once.I just want to point out that a 910' building, if it popped up tomorrow, would be 287th (or worse) in the world. That's based on completed buildings, today, in the skyscraperpage database. I'm sure there are plenty in China and some other places that aren't on there. Also, according to the same database, there are 165 buildings currently under construction that are over 910', meaning even a 910' building, which is 120' taller than the Hancock, soon wouldn't make the world's top 450.
OK fineIs this Archboston or Pornhub?
OK fine
point taken
I didn't mean it like that but looking back it seems like unfortunate wording- oh well.
5/12 from Woburn. Look at how much it towers over its neighbors here. It will visually be the second tallest building on the downtown skyline from this view, until Winthrop Square is topped off. I have a strong feeling this one is really going ~630' to the top of the higher fin.
IMG_9039 by David Z, on Flickr
IMG_9043 by David Z, on Flickr