State Street HQ | One Congress | Bulfinch Crossing | West End

JumboBuc said:
Not an engineer, but:
Concrete cores are good at providing shear support against lateral forces. That is, if you build a steel structure where all the joints are at right angles, there's little to prevent lateral forces from pushing those rectangles sideways into parallelograms. A concrete wall won't get pushed sideways into a parallelogram because it's a solid plane. So it makes sense to build solid concrete walls up the middle of building to provide shear support and then attach right-angle steel framing to it, with the core preventing the right-angle steel joints from twisting.

If you don't have concrete "shear walls" then you need to add in angle-bracing to provide the shear support. A right-angle square can get pushed into a parallelogram, but not if it has diagonal bracing that basically creates the hypotenuse of a right triangle inside the square. Plenty of steel structures do this instead of using a concrete core, but it's more complicated and often costlier than just putting up concrete. But concrete is way heavier than steel, so if you're adding new floors on top of existing ones (like at Avalon North Station or the office component of Hub on Causeway) it often makes sense to use steel angle bracing instead of concrete for shear support. You'll also probably see steel angle bracing at the air rights project by Lansdowne Station for the same reason.

There are building codes and standards requiring certain levels of shear support, but these can be met with concrete shear walls or with steel angle bracing. It's just a question of which works better for your project, and with built-from-scratch towers on terra firma, a concrete core is usually the cheaper and easier way to go.

Concrete is also good in the case of fires, but you can meet fire standards with properly designed steel too.
Click to expand...
Just wanted to say thanks a lot for this info, it's much appreciated.
 
JumboBuc said:
Not an engineer, but:
Concrete cores are good at providing shear support against lateral forces. That is, if you build a steel structure where all the joints are at right angles, there's little to prevent lateral forces from pushing those rectangles sideways into parallelograms. A concrete wall won't get pushed sideways into a parallelogram because it's a solid plane. So it makes sense to build solid concrete walls up the middle of building to provide shear support and then attach right-angle steel framing to it, with the core preventing the right-angle steel joints from twisting.

If you don't have concrete "shear walls" then you need to add in angle-bracing to provide the shear support. A right-angle square can get pushed into a parallelogram, but not if it has diagonal bracing that basically creates the hypotenuse of a right triangle inside the square. Plenty of steel structures do this instead of using a concrete core, but it's more complicated and often costlier than just putting up concrete. But concrete is way heavier than steel, so if you're adding new floors on top of existing ones (like at Avalon North Station or the office component of Hub on Causeway) it often makes sense to use steel angle bracing instead of concrete for shear support. You'll also probably see steel angle bracing at the air rights project by Lansdowne Station for the same reason.

There are building codes and standards requiring certain levels of shear support, but these can be met with concrete shear walls or with steel angle bracing. It's just a question of which works better for your project, and with built-from-scratch towers on terra firma, a concrete core is usually the cheaper and easier way to go.

Concrete is also good in the case of fires, but you can meet fire standards with properly designed steel too.
Click to expand...

I am an engineer and this is actually a pretty good description!
 
51416239506_859aae851d_b.jpg


51415492042_e4a29849a1_b.jpg


51417222250_6839090fa5_b.jpg
 
Jahvon09 said:
Note that in these few pics, the name on the Pru Tower is blocked. Everyone knows that it's the Pru Tower. So why is the name blocked? Hah!! :unsure:
Click to expand...
@Jahvon09 , there is scaffolding on the Prudential Tower's top few floors for the $100 million sky observatory renovation there. That is why the name is currently blocked atop the skyscraper.
 
Sounds about right. I think they are doing a lot there to make it a superb program. 😊
 
Guess that it can't receive the crown until the facade is finished. Hah!! :unsure:
 
Question;

What will happen with the other two towers when THIS one is about to open for business? Will they be kept by the company? :unsure:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top