Re: Residences at Kensington
To that, I would say. The buildings only need to be 20% higher, and your density grows by the same amount. The impact on the skyline would do nothing. A 340 foot building becomes 400, a 290 foot building becomes 350. From afar, this would affect little (particularly as they would still be dwarfed by any actual highrises), and would not come near the 600 - 800 foot "towers" we clamour for.
I'm coming around somewhat to buildings like this. They're not great, nor are they awful. What I like is that they are different, but not just because they are different. They are different in that they are not trying to match some sort of Bostonism. The great thing about buildings is the differences, particularly the generational differences. I love the time machine that buildings can be as you walk from neighborhood to neighborhood or block to block.
This building doesn't try to do too much. There's no bolt ons. It's not a Pontiac from the 90's with a bunch of plastic glued on to be sporty compared to the Chevy. It's just a residential high rise, that contrats well with some surrounding buildings, but blends into the area quite nicely.
I'd also say, any kind of "signature tower" in this location would be much more odd and eye jarring than this inoffensive effort.
Anyways. By all means, carry on with whatever one liners or labels you can come up with to entertain yourselves.