Boston02124
Senior Member
- Joined
- Sep 6, 2007
- Messages
- 6,870
- Reaction score
- 6,408
Re: Residences at Kensington
The Kensington | 665 Washington Street | Downtown
- Thread starter KentXie
- Start date
Beton Brut
Senior Member
- Joined
- May 25, 2006
- Messages
- 4,382
- Reaction score
- 335
Re: Residences at Kensington
What an awful fucking mess.
Dogshit materials aside, a few better (i.e. competent) design decisions could have improved this vertical favela for the well-heeled.
• A gesture (in form or material) where the glass meets the precast;
• Details that enhance the vertical, to turn the eye upward;
• A cornice;
I'm not convinced that the three simple concepts I listed above would have significantly increased the cost to construct a building of this scale. This is just incompetent design, made worse by the materials.
By comparison, the original scheme looks like the Chrysler Building.
What an awful fucking mess.
Dogshit materials aside, a few better (i.e. competent) design decisions could have improved this vertical favela for the well-heeled.
• A gesture (in form or material) where the glass meets the precast;
• Details that enhance the vertical, to turn the eye upward;
• A cornice;
I'm not convinced that the three simple concepts I listed above would have significantly increased the cost to construct a building of this scale. This is just incompetent design, made worse by the materials.
By comparison, the original scheme looks like the Chrysler Building.
type001
Senior Member
- Joined
- Jun 29, 2006
- Messages
- 1,731
- Reaction score
- 233
Re: Residences at Kensington
Boston is 11th worldwide in GDP. However, 8th or 9th in the US wouldn't be too shabby either.
Boston is 11th worldwide in GDP. However, 8th or 9th in the US wouldn't be too shabby either.
HenryAlan
Senior Member
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2009
- Messages
- 3,901
- Reaction score
- 3,755
Re: Residences at Kensington
While some might go over board with the world class city line, quite a few seem to go to the other extreme when they express their sense of Bostons's place in the pecking order. We have a big, wealthy, important city, whether or not everybody at Archboston understands this fact.
While some might go over board with the world class city line, quite a few seem to go to the other extreme when they express their sense of Bostons's place in the pecking order. We have a big, wealthy, important city, whether or not everybody at Archboston understands this fact.
atlantaden
Senior Member
- Joined
- May 31, 2006
- Messages
- 2,594
- Reaction score
- 2,692
Re: Residences at Kensington
Beeline, thanks so much for your pics!! My question to you is...how does the Kensington look to you? I'm seeing lots of intense criticism but how does it look in real life and not from posted pics? Actually, the question is for anyone who has actually seen the building from street level!
Beeline, thanks so much for your pics!! My question to you is...how does the Kensington look to you? I'm seeing lots of intense criticism but how does it look in real life and not from posted pics? Actually, the question is for anyone who has actually seen the building from street level!
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2012
- Messages
- 13,981
- Reaction score
- 22,075
Re: Residences at Kensington
A disappointment, but it does serve as a contrast the Ritz buildings. Bottom line is I would not live in it.
tocoto
Active Member
- Joined
- May 25, 2006
- Messages
- 385
- Reaction score
- 82
Re: Residences at Kensington
Obviously not a great building but not the worst building from a lot of angles.
State services building in foreground is really clunky and awkward...
From the Common, Heritage on the Common is pretty ugly and also right on the park.
From a skyline perspective, a lost opportunity like so many others, but not prominent enough to do too much damage (I know a weak defense)
Obviously not a great building but not the worst building from a lot of angles.
State services building in foreground is really clunky and awkward...
Tufts looks truly awful from this angle, and trinity(?) is also very weak...
From the Common, Heritage on the Common is pretty ugly and also right on the park.
From a skyline perspective, a lost opportunity like so many others, but not prominent enough to do too much damage (I know a weak defense)
kz1000ps
Senior Member
- Joined
- May 28, 2006
- Messages
- 8,818
- Reaction score
- 10,256
Re: Residences at Kensington
It isn't half-bad in this view...dare I say the waviness actually looks kind of good. But to answer atlantaden's question:
It doesn't really matter where you view it from...you could be 3,000 miles away or across the street and it'll look like a sham job. The skyline perspectives are lacking though not horrible, but it's up close where the wretchedness really shines through. Looking back, I think this older post of mine does a good job showing this thing for what it is. Also, this picture:
Despite some people's valiant attempts to say "the tower is fine, stop whining", this thing deserves the all the criticism it gets.
It isn't half-bad in this view...dare I say the waviness actually looks kind of good. But to answer atlantaden's question:
It doesn't really matter where you view it from...you could be 3,000 miles away or across the street and it'll look like a sham job. The skyline perspectives are lacking though not horrible, but it's up close where the wretchedness really shines through. Looking back, I think this older post of mine does a good job showing this thing for what it is. Also, this picture:
Despite some people's valiant attempts to say "the tower is fine, stop whining", this thing deserves the all the criticism it gets.
J
JoeBoston1
Guest
Re: Residences at Kensington
If the glass shoots upwards -- covering the cornice, the yellow area and that entire plane -- this building might look … okay ? Dare I say?
It would be two blocks of different materials merging. This was the original intent of the building according to initial renders.
Put your pitchforks down, at least until the building is finished.
If the glass shoots upwards -- covering the cornice, the yellow area and that entire plane -- this building might look … okay ? Dare I say?
It would be two blocks of different materials merging. This was the original intent of the building according to initial renders.
Put your pitchforks down, at least until the building is finished.
And come on. That looks kind of cool. Admit it. Come on. Just a bit.From yesterday.
BarbaricManchurian
Senior Member
- Joined
- Mar 12, 2007
- Messages
- 1,067
- Reaction score
- 64
Re: Residences at Kensington
No it doesn't. Looks like utter shit.
No it doesn't. Looks like utter shit.
Ron Newman
Senior Member
- Joined
- May 30, 2006
- Messages
- 8,395
- Reaction score
- 11
Re: Residences at Kensington
If you put just about anything modern right next to a red stone H.H. Richardson building, it's going to look bad.
If you put just about anything modern right next to a red stone H.H. Richardson building, it's going to look bad.
commuter guy
Active Member
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2007
- Messages
- 883
- Reaction score
- 114
Re: Residences at Kensington
From yesterday.
IMG_9110
From my layman's perspective the Washington Street facade is really a shame. No texture or visual relief, the windows appear to be stickers on a plastic facade. I'm assuming this more or less represents the final product as it relates to the curb level view. I can tolerate the building from afar in the skyline but the view for the pedestrian on Washington St., yikes!
Re: Residences at Kensington
The ground level offends me in every possible way and it sits right across from one of my favorite Pho places so now I get to experience it on a weekly basis.
Tower portion... Definitely not good, but it's not offensive either.
The ground level offends me in every possible way and it sits right across from one of my favorite Pho places so now I get to experience it on a weekly basis.
Tower portion... Definitely not good, but it's not offensive either.
dshoost88
Senior Member
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2008
- Messages
- 2,158
- Reaction score
- 2,510
Re: Residences at Kensington
This reminds me of a story I read about a Parisian journalist in the late 19th century who was vehemently disgusted by the Eiffel Tower. He frequently wrote columns saying what a negative dent it made in Paris' skyline. Years later, however, it was discovered that this same journalist went for coffee almost everyday at the cafe atop the tower. When asked why, he said it was because that cafe was the only place in all of Paris that he could enjoy the skyline without seeing it ruined by the Eiffel Tower.
Moral to the story: lets hope a new Pho restaurant opens at the Kensington Residences.
This reminds me of a story I read about a Parisian journalist in the late 19th century who was vehemently disgusted by the Eiffel Tower. He frequently wrote columns saying what a negative dent it made in Paris' skyline. Years later, however, it was discovered that this same journalist went for coffee almost everyday at the cafe atop the tower. When asked why, he said it was because that cafe was the only place in all of Paris that he could enjoy the skyline without seeing it ruined by the Eiffel Tower.
Moral to the story: lets hope a new Pho restaurant opens at the Kensington Residences.
Re: Residences at Kensington
You know, this is a mid-rise designed to add density, not to be a signature tower.
In 15-20 years, as this area gets more developed, this building will fold more and more into the background. I personally don't find it offensive, but I do see, at least at ground level, why people hate this.
You know, this is a mid-rise designed to add density, not to be a signature tower.
In 15-20 years, as this area gets more developed, this building will fold more and more into the background. I personally don't find it offensive, but I do see, at least at ground level, why people hate this.
Re: Residences at Kensington
I don't think anyone's arguing for a signature tower here. There are acres of middle ground between a signature tower and a heap of uninspired cheap shit. On a qulity scale of 1-10 this thing's a -2.
I don't think anyone's arguing for a signature tower here. There are acres of middle ground between a signature tower and a heap of uninspired cheap shit. On a qulity scale of 1-10 this thing's a -2.
Boston02124
Senior Member
- Joined
- Sep 6, 2007
- Messages
- 6,870
- Reaction score
- 6,408
Re: Residences at Kensington
from camb.
from camb.