I hope Walsh turns out better than Menino by implementing meaningful city planning and encouraging the type of amenities which make Boston attractive to young adults.
Both were pro development, but Walsh is a hard core union man which makes me a bit uneasy regarding the direction of development in the city. We need quality development as much as quantity, but the unions just want quantity. Connolly seemed to at least articulate a preference for transit based development as well as separating planning functions from economic development. From what I've read, Walsh wants to get rid of the BRA but then more or less create a new economic development agency where planning reports to the economic development head.
Then there is the issue of loosening the noose on all things "fun" for adults in the city. Again Connolly was open to loosening happy hour regulations and supports increasing the availability of liquor licenses which would decrease the cost to open new venues. I think Walsh may be more open to change than Menino, but it seems, relative to Connolly, he did not emphasize or recognize the relationship between improving urban amenities and economic development.