bigpicture7
Senior Member
- Joined
- May 5, 2016
- Messages
- 3,768
- Reaction score
- 8,733
Re: 111 Federal St. | Formerly Trans National Place (Winthrop Square) Part 2
well, in spaces conducive to tall towers at least...
I think there are also many on this board who appreciate what GE is doing for that particular parcel (really expanding/enhancing a desolate area of the Channel with a potentially impactful channel-side campus+public realm).
But with regard to this discussion: it is indeed interesting that the motivators for corporations to build iconic tall towers may have ebbed in boston. SalesForce in SF, Devon in OKC, are the modern day corporate odes-to-self that we aren't seeing in boston these days...I wonder what the different factors are that sparked those towers elsewhere but not here?
All true, but it doesn't get us an "iconic tower", which this board really seems to pine for.
well, in spaces conducive to tall towers at least...
I think there are also many on this board who appreciate what GE is doing for that particular parcel (really expanding/enhancing a desolate area of the Channel with a potentially impactful channel-side campus+public realm).
But with regard to this discussion: it is indeed interesting that the motivators for corporations to build iconic tall towers may have ebbed in boston. SalesForce in SF, Devon in OKC, are the modern day corporate odes-to-self that we aren't seeing in boston these days...I wonder what the different factors are that sparked those towers elsewhere but not here?