Allston-Brighton Infill and Small Developments

The most recent shots I have are from October 15th. From Brainerd Street:

img0879ra6.jpg


img0881am4.jpg


I thought squares as ornamentation went out of fashion circa 1992? From Harvard Ave:

img0882jg8.jpg


Again, I'm behind on these smaller projects right in my area, but here's some shots from November 5th of the Walgreens going up in Union Square.

img1575ys0.jpg


img1574en6.jpg


I was just by there the other day and it looked like steel erection was complete.
 
...I also thought baby blue window panelling went out around 1963.
 
1/13.. 226 Harvard:

img4759sc5.jpg


img4758xv2.jpg


Completely Off-Topic, but the car buffs will appreciate this: my first sighting of the awe-inspiring Nissan GT-R. Godzilla in the flesh!

img4760ew5.jpg


And yesterday, the frigid 17th, here's the Walgreens in Union Square:

img4834sa6.jpg


img4835uh7.jpg


^ lousy shots, but it was much too cold to stray even a millimeter off my set course!
 
Office addition on Comm Ave, around the BU West stop:

img8286.jpg
 
It's not perfect, but it's a start to adding some density and girth to these one-story buildings. Nice that they didn't crap up the detailing, too.
 
Bother with what? The blank brick wall is presumably waiting for someone to demolish the gas station next door and erect a matching building.
 
Bother replacing a crummy building with a crummy building.
 
Those things are the semi-urban equivalent of the suburban box store. They're semi-urban in that they are built up to the street, with the parking behind, but still manage to damage the street. They're always chain drugstores, supermarkets, or Staples. We should come up with a name for them. I say we call them McBoxes.
 
Who is the occupant of this building? I can't tell from the photo. I see a Staples, but that's next door.
 
Given the site size, the height restrictions, the need for retail parking and the need to maximize the floor plate, the desire to turn a profit in a low-rent district and placate the always-angry neighborhood groups - what else could this little patch of dirt sprout than a stumpy, faux-brick cheap looking box?

It is sad. We haven't had a mayor in so long we forget what it's like to have a leader instead of a manager.
 
That building could be made much better with some very minor cosmetic additions. I think I might have to scan a sketch later to make the point.

What really hurts these buildings, and for the matter most modern buildings, are cheap windows which lack any articulated depth.
 
That building could be made much better with some very minor cosmetic additions.

If they cut half the windows it would already look nicer.

pelhamhall said:
It is sad. We haven't had a mayor in so long we forget what it's like to have a leader instead of a manager.

The mayor really didn't have anything to do with this, the blame is on the developer.
 
It's not perfect, but it's a start to adding some density and girth to these one-story buildings. Nice that they didn't crap up the detailing, too.

Just FYI, its a BU owned building and theyve touted how it will be geothermally heated, one of the only such buildings in the area.
 
To be honest, I'd rather see a teeming, denser neighborhood of shoddily built 2-3 story buildings like the one next to Staples than a street full of one-story taxpayers of the most exquisite detail, as Harvard Ave./St. becomes when it enters Brookline and passes through JFK Crossing.

This building vastly improved the no-mans-land of parking lots, big boxes, and auto-related businesses marring the otherwise relatively urban corridor between Brookline and Allston.
 

Back
Top