Boston02124
Senior Member
- Joined
- Sep 6, 2007
- Messages
- 6,871
- Reaction score
- 6,421
Timely article just popped up...
There's not one Somerville public school located on the Assembly side of the underpass. When taking into account that 15 percent of the 26,903 of people living within a one-mile radius of Assembly Row are earning less than $15,000 per year and likely can't afford to send their children to private school or drive them personally, it becomes clearer that the underpass is used just as much if not more for sustaining a family's quality of life than for touring Assembly.
Teresa Vazquez-Dodero, Executive Director of ESMS, told me about one family in which a young child was forced to miss several school days this winter on top of mandatory snow days because the Kensington Underpass wasn't properly cleared and maintained. In bootstrapped households where an education is paramount, this simply is unacceptable.
This passage confuses me for a couple reasons;
It sounds to me like the public school is on the side of 93 where most poor people near Assembly live. The exception would be in Ten Hills, but you wouldn't go anywhere near the Kensington Underpass in such a case (not that their solutions are much better). I could be wrong but I'm doubting there are many poor people in Assembly itself. As for the second paragraph, wouldn't it be the responsibility of the city to bus kids whose parents can't afford to drive them? Certainly they shouldn't be forced to walk across Route 38, snow or not.
Also shocked that some of these underpasses have names.
The only way you can be poor and live in Assembly is if you have an affordable unit. Otherwise, the rents are out of control.
I doubt you can afford one of the "affordable" units in Assembly if you are only making 15k a year. The "lower" limit on those units are usually something like 35k. The only way to be living in Somerville on that income is if you are in state or federal public housing. The highest concentration of that in the area is just across from Ten Hills, along Mystic Ave.
I think we can all agree Somerville needs better pedestrian access anywhere that legacy highways cut through town. Fix them all.
Beyond that it is a hopeless muddle to try to find tune the equity and access arguments. The desire to walk seems a top-earners desire (even though they/we have lots of modal choices) but a bottom-earners need (though they may aspire to buy a car).
The traditional car-centric middle may even have disdain for both, but they're not the problem @ Assembly and not much anywhere in Somerville either.
Assembly would be a LOT more accessible if they could hash things out with the T to snake the river walk behind Charlestown Garage and associated properties to reach Alford St.
I'm sure others have waxed poetical on this already, but for all the negativity about the artificiality of Assembly, it carries on a great tradition from the NYC Commissioners Plan of 1811, which laid out that city's grid system.
The surveyors wandered the wilderness of northern Manhattan, driving pilings into the ground to mark intersections that would only come into existence decades later (or sometimes not at all as those around Central Park show).
A scene from 42nd Street and 2nd Avenue in 1861 shows the work in progress. People had fun strolling the incomplete city just like they do today around Assembly. I think the jaded suburban side of us is what invites the criticism of Assembly. We expect our cities to already be finished. For a board like this we should be doing the opposite—celebrating a city in the making. Even if we still want to poopoo the finishes.