Atlantic Wharf (née Russia Wharf) | Atlantic Ave | Waterfront

Re: Atlantic Wharf (formerly Russia Wharf)

Little Building -- office building reused as Emerson dormitory
Boston Five Cents Savings Bank reused as Borders bookstore (an improvement)
Cadillac-Olds car dealership reused as BU academic and arts building
Temple Israel reused as BU Morse Auditorium
Various hotels reused as college dorms at BU and MIT
Union Wharf - reused as offices and condos
Mills and warehouses reused as artist lofts (sometimes live/work spaces) -- Fort Point Channel, South End, Allston, Somerville, Lowell, lots of other places

The most common adaptive reuse is probably the conversion of old schools and churches into residential condos.
 
Re: Atlantic Wharf (formerly Russia Wharf)

Not a fair example because it lacks a tower (or any additional space), but 400 Atlantic Ave is an absolutely beautiful office building. It's the second building north of the Northern Ave Bridge. Used to be (25 years ago) a wharf building falling into the Atlantic like Russia Wharf and then it was redone as class A office space. Goulston and Storrs is the anchor tenant.

I've had a couple meetings there an I'm always struck by how well they maintained the things that make the building work. Interior brick arches, plenty of granite, exposed wood where appropriate, etc.. Just a beautiful building inside. Worth stopping in to fake ask for directions next time your in the neighborhood.
 
Re: Atlantic Wharf (formerly Russia Wharf)

Hi,

New member here. Been lurking for a while but decided to take the plunge on this since the last few posts of adaptive re-use made me think immediately of my old condo growing up at the Prince Building (63 Atlantic Ave); a former pasta factory turned into condos. The parking garage on the ground floor used to be the loading bay for trains that would dock inside the building.

Anyway, I'm an avid "urbanist". I'm originally from the Boston area but now I am a student in Ottawa, Ontario (if you think it's bad in Boston, come up to Ottawa if you want a hair-pulling experience) and will be moving shortly to Toronto where I'll hopefully be completing my undergrad degree in urban planning. That said, I really enjoy reading up on what's new in my native city and like you am often frustrated by how good development gets stymied in the politics of the city.

Cheers!

P.S. In reference to the building, I really hate the new name. Could you get a little more generic than "Atlantic Wharf"? Russia Wharf was such a cool name.
 
Re: Atlantic Wharf (formerly Russia Wharf)

Welcome to the forum! I agree Atlantic Wharf couldn't be more generic.
 
Re: Atlantic Wharf (formerly Russia Wharf)

columbus st ?
015-16.jpg
 
Re: Atlantic Wharf (formerly Russia Wharf)

Channel Center (developer, Beacon Capital Partners) was amazingly successful, fairly recent reuse project (architect, Bruner Cott, also known for Mass Moca). The project included rehabs of upwards of 14 historic buildings, a modern infill (125') condo and permitting for another 125' and 150' modern office structures. The current owner of roughly half of the original properties, Commonwealth Holdings, is considering a historic rehab instead of a demo at the 125' site (already permitted). This project has pushed Fort Point in an incredibly positive direction.

For a project of this massive scale, Channel Center zipped through BRA approvals as other area projects languished, and for ALL the right reasons.

In the end, softening of the residential market may have hit Beacon hard, but I'd guess this project was on whole a plus for the company.
 
Re: Atlantic Wharf (formerly Russia Wharf)

Channel Center (developer, Beacon Capital Partners) was amazingly successful

From what point of view? I thought Beacon took a bath on the project. I think the Channel Center looks great and has added a ton of life to the neighborhood, but I think it's tough to call it a success.

Beacon Capital Sells Channel Center Piece At Loss, Boston Globe, March 6, 2007.
 
Re: Atlantic Wharf (formerly Russia Wharf)

Channel Center has been amazingly successful, I would suspect from the point of view of ANY resident of the neighborhood, as I am.

I'm no realtor, but the Channel Center condos seem to have sold well, and the office space recently renovated by Commonwealth seems fairly well tenanted, with a new restaurant opening on the ground floor.

As for Beacon, I mentioned that I thought they might have been hit hard by a portion of the project, as the article seems to confirm. I have no idea how they could take a bath on the development rights for selling development rights for new construction the 150' tower and 125' tower, which were (when purchased) just a two story historic building (demolished) and a 5 story historic building.
 
Re: Atlantic Wharf (formerly Russia Wharf)

From Sicilian:
I'm no realtor, but the Channel Center condos seem to have sold well
From the Boston Globe:
Channel Center condos didn't sell like hot cakes

From Sicilian:
I have no idea how they could take a bath on the development rights
From the Boston Globe:
Alan Leventhal's Midas touch didn't work on one property in Boston.
And,
One real estate executive briefed on the firm's experience with it said that overall the investment fund had strong returns in spite of Channel Center.

I'm not trying to bad mouth Channel Center. I worked on Melcher St before my company was kicked out by the owner/developer who "planned to redevelop" what is still an empty building 4 years later. And I saw what an awesome addition Channel Center was to the neighborhood. I just mean it's hard to call something a success if it doesn't make money if only because it will never be replicated if it's not profitable.
 
Re: Atlantic Wharf (formerly Russia Wharf)

Channel Center (developer, Beacon Capital Partners) was amazingly successful, fairly recent reuse project (architect, Bruner Cott, also known for Mass Moca).

I'll stand by that quote.

Nine years after Beacon's arrival in Fort Point, and two years after the Globe article, the project has proven to be a tremendous boon to our neighborhood in terms of new residents, vitality, etc.

I wasn't gauging its success by Beacon's success, nor do I think Beacon's experience has impacted the success of those who followed them, for example Berkeley's projects on Congress.

I'm not an expert, but if I was guaging the success of Faneuill Hall I wouldn't dig up the accounting books of the developers from 10 years ago or 100 years ago. I'd look at the project today.
 
Re: Atlantic Wharf (formerly Russia Wharf)

I just mean it's hard to call something a success if it doesn't make money if only because it will never be replicated if it's not profitable.

Articles about FP3 sales from 1-2 years ago were dismal.

In 2009, things seem to be looking better.

Whatever the case, I'd call Berkeley's adaptive reuse project an amazing success as well as Beacon's Channel Center.

***********

Something Is Going On'
One Boston Condo Developer Didn't Panic, Found Success
Fort Point's FP3 Project Seeing Sales Increase During Downturn

By Paul McMorrow
Banker & Tradesman Staff Writer
11/16/09
FP3, the 92-unit condominium project in Boston?s Fort Point neighborhood,
came online weeks before the bottom fell out of the city?s red-hot condo
market. Last year set records for big condo deals, but an economy limping
along on life support put an end to that. Transactions tumbled by upwards of
60 percent. New condo construction became un-financeable, and real estate
observers took to talking about large blocks of unsold units like an
albatross around developers? necks.

FP3?s developer, Berkeley Investments, didn?t panic. Berkeley overhauled the
project?s marketing, trimmed prices and resolved to work through the
doldrums. They emphasized the warehouse-and-infill project?s location,
award-winning architecture, amenities (including two new Barbara Lynch
establishments) and value.

That strategy is now paying dividends.

Some new condo developments have spent much of the year averaging less than
one sale per month; Berkeley was doing two to three during the summer, and
closed seven in October. Three more are under agreement, and four others are
being held on reservation. Berkeley believes FP3 is the busiest new condo
development in town.

No Quick Turnaround

?It didn?t happen overnight,? said Berkeley principal Young Park. He said
the project?s repositioning efforts had an eye on ?the intrinsic value of
FP3, given the market, the neighborhood and our building. It was clear, from
our perspective, that the project offers something very unique.?

?We are confident in our optimism that the market is getting better,? added
Joseph Laurano, director of operations for Berkeley?s residential marketing
group. After a strong autumn, Laurano predicted FP3 will hit the 51 percent
sold mark in the coming months, allowing Berkeley to tap a much wider pool
of buyers with Fannie Mae-backed financing.

?The momentum is building off itself. We have good value and good momentum.?

Building momentum isn?t necessarily the go-to plan at Boston-area condo
developments. Year-to-date condo sales in Boston are off last year?s pace by
16 percent, according to data from The Warren Group, publisher of Banker &
Tradesman. Statewide year-to-date condo sales have also slowed by 16
percent. The owners of a few high-profile new developments have responded to
that slowdown by putting some, or all, of their units on the auction block *
often at steep discounts. Others have backed off condos altogether, and
converted to rentals.

Early in the spring, Berkeley committed to a strategy of trimming prices by
an average of 15 percent, and working through the sales process steadily.
Park said Berkeley decided to discount the project?s lower floors, believing
?it was not the time to be pushing million-dollar-plus penthouse units. For
them to be successful, we had to firm up the base.?

Reengaging The Community

Laurano credited the swell in activity to a decision Berkeley made several
months ago to bring their marketing operations in-house. As head of
Berkeley?s new ResMark unit, Laurano reengaged Boston?s brokerage community,
launching an event-based marketing effort that established firm links
between the project and Fort Point?s arts and fashion scene. They saw foot
traffic nearly double right off the bat.

He said ResMark also worked hard to combat the notion that FP3 was a tough
place to do a deal.

?Whether it was true or not, we worked hard to change that perception,? he
said. Berkeley now is tossing in extras like free parking and prepaid condo
fees to get deals to closing.

?We are flexible. We are reasonable. If we are close, we will make it
happen.?

?In the condo landscape, as devastated as it was, there were opportunities
to attract people who sought value,? Park said. Berkeley bet that price
points and supply and demand fundamentals were in their favor. Laurano is
seeing tremendous activity in studios, one-bedrooms and one-bedroom-plus
units priced in the $300,000 to $700,000 range. Penthouse units, with
commanding views of the Boston skyline and Fort Point?s brick-and-beam
warehouses, are priced under $1,000 per-square-foot.

?Something is going on,? Laurano said. ?We closed seven in the month, and
we?re not giving them away.? He added, ?The sense of urgency has returned to
this building. Folks will come on Sunday for an open house, and by the time
they zero in on three or four units, their top two are gone. They almost
don?t believe you.?

?It?s picking up, but it?s very value-conscious,? Park added. ?You can?t
blame buyers for wanting the best deal. Because there?s no new supply,
people will naturally navigate to projects that have the right combination
of immediate value and long-term growth potential.?

In September, Massachusetts saw its first year-over-year increase in condo
sales volume in more than two years, according to Warren Group data. Sales
volume in the third quarter was down 3 percent year-over-year, compared to a
16 percent year-to-date slide.

?Time is on our side now,? Laurano said. He predicted upward pressure on
pricing in the spring, thanks to dwindling new supply and a growing pool of
buyers.

Park argued that most condo auctions have been the result of lender
pressure.

?We not only met lender requirements, but we also refinanced our
construction loan in pretty tough market conditions,? he said. ?Do we wish
the market was more positive? We all share that hope. But it is what it is.
We?re certainly not losing sleep over it. There are opportunities in the
marketplace. The key is executing well what you have in your portfolio
today, so you can take advantage of the opportunities tomorrow.?
 
Re: Atlantic Wharf (formerly Russia Wharf)

I don't consider either project a "success" but I haven't done the math. Is 'success' resales profits? Property tax revenue? New neighborhoods? New NIMBYs? 24-hour a day life? Redaptive reuse? ROI?

FP3 is 46% sold, I think. As a stand-alone building, it can't create a neighborhood. Channel Center, which I originally loved, is an oasis surrounded by barren land. You can't walk anywhere to anything. I was so excited by the grand plans but those are gone, now.
 
Re: Atlantic Wharf (formerly Russia Wharf)

If someone asks me if the Empire State Building is a success I don't ask whether the original developer had a tremendous ROI, or if the office space was tenanted in 1934.

I look at the building and the contribution it has made to the district it is sited in.
 
Re: Atlantic Wharf (formerly Russia Wharf)

Nice to see Banker & Tradesman giving the FP3 publicity team a printed blowjob. A little reporting would show that after SLASHING prices (surprise-surprise) the units started to sell. That is what we call in real estate "a failure".

Housing in this area is a failed proposition. Nobody wants to live in this area. That's why the free market of human choice has to be suspended and the government has to step in, regulate and dictate that developers build housing. I don't understand why. If people don't want to live here, why force residential uses? If there is a pent up demand of Financial District offices that would happily move here into lower-rent offices, then why stop them in favor of residences that are undesirable?
 
Re: Atlantic Wharf (formerly Russia Wharf)

If people don't want to live here, why force residential uses?

Because sometimes people really don't know what they want, or what is better for them, and need Big Brother to decide for them.
 
Re: Atlantic Wharf (formerly Russia Wharf)

So much for the history of urban planning.

As for Big Brother, it's funny on other threads how much support there is for taxpayer funded infrastructure, convention centers and other publicly funded goodies. I'm sure developers and realtors interested in ROI won't be shy lining up in support of the enrichment of their properties using money from the public trough. But if City Hall takes an interest in long-term planning and zoning, damn the torpedoes.
 
Re: Atlantic Wharf (formerly Russia Wharf)

It's massively inefficient to trust the market here. There's a glut of office space in the Financial District; it's just the vagaries of capitalism that demand an even larger glut before rents start falling. Meanwhile, housing prices are still high. Why haven't they been relieved by construction in Fort Point? For one, there's not much of it, and that's part of the problem. People want to live in a neighborhood, not an isolated factory-loft, and for that, you need critical mass. You also need services like grocery stores. If the city got its act together on planning the area and offering incentives to services residents needed, it could flourish as a residential area.

And in the meantime, for office space, how about a limit on the amount of time owners can wait before letting rents drop. Half the city is literally empty because speculators are betting on a turnaround, even if it means dipping into the red for years. That goes for retail too, and it's deadening the streets downtown.
 
Re: Atlantic Wharf (formerly Russia Wharf)

Czsz, did you just recommend a government imposed rent ceiling on commercial office space?

Vacancies are up because unemployment is up. Could you get a company that needs 50,000 SF to take 100,000 SF if you cut the rent in half? Maybe. Is that a good thing? No.
 
Re: Atlantic Wharf (formerly Russia Wharf)

It's massively inefficient to trust the market here. There's a glut of office space in the Financial District; it's just the vagaries of capitalism that demand an even larger glut before rents start falling.

And in the meantime, for office space, how about a limit on the amount of time owners can wait before letting rents drop. Half the city is literally empty because speculators are betting on a turnaround, even if it means dipping into the red for years. That goes for retail too, and it's deadening the streets downtown.

This isn't true. Commercial RE rents have already fallen 15%-25% depending on the building and location. Tenants whose leases expire in 2012 are shopping now to lock in these bargain rates. Vacancy rates are in the low teens for Class A office space, which isn't great - but to say "half the city is literally empty" is a bit of hyperbole.
 

Back
Top