J
JoeBoston1
Guest
Re: New Tower(s) Planned For Prudential Center
That exact location is pretty good for a super-tall. I'd make sure there's a nicer interface at street-level in lieu of the Hynes.
The Western Half of the Back Bay has never really equaled the Eastern Half. It's because there's no major anchor down there, just that worthless Hynes facade.
If the tower could fix that, and properly channel the western half of Back Bay vis-a-vis the tower, the impact in terms of residential real estate value and accompanying tax income for the city would be immense.
It's the most "Boston" place to build one. Low-slung brick residential, understated retail, erudite super-tall. It's a formula that works.
In contrast to the South Station and Transnational Place locations -- which mimic Chicago or New York formulas: glass-tower residential, glass-tower commercial, dirty-street retail.
In the years to come I wouldn't be surprised to see a super-tall or two proposed here.
That exact location is pretty good for a super-tall. I'd make sure there's a nicer interface at street-level in lieu of the Hynes.
The Western Half of the Back Bay has never really equaled the Eastern Half. It's because there's no major anchor down there, just that worthless Hynes facade.
If the tower could fix that, and properly channel the western half of Back Bay vis-a-vis the tower, the impact in terms of residential real estate value and accompanying tax income for the city would be immense.
It's the most "Boston" place to build one. Low-slung brick residential, understated retail, erudite super-tall. It's a formula that works.
In contrast to the South Station and Transnational Place locations -- which mimic Chicago or New York formulas: glass-tower residential, glass-tower commercial, dirty-street retail.