I'm not sure how I missed this - sorry if I'm restating what everyone knew to be obvious. The sheet of glass planned for the front pedestal section is actually the five story parking garage!
Not sure whether to laugh or cry.
It's not any worse than what was there before which was a parking lot... It's also a tiny space. They don't have a lot of options for putting the garage ingress.
It is a shame that the garage entrance is located there, but it is a lot better than a parking lot, and I have to agree with meddlepal that there don't appear to be a lot of options, other than the Lovejoy Wharf option of eliminating the parking altogether. This appears to be the only realistic location for the parking entrance given the site configuration. At least they have tried to mitigate it with something interesting to divert attention from the perhaps necessary evil of parking access.
You are correct, we (on the IAG) and the BRA pushed them hard to find an alternative to the garage entrance, to allow a small Stuart Street retail or something. There was no way to make the traffic flow work from the back only (La Grange Street). Other properties are in the way of making La Grange fully two way.
Off topic: I'm thinking of taking my girl to Jacob Wirth's. What's the best stuff on their menu?
Off topic: I'm thinking of taking my girl to Jacob Wirth's. What's the best stuff on their menu?
Are we sure this thing is under 300'? It certainly looks higher based on the newest render and floor count. I thought originally it was something like 312'? Still looks that tall to me.
Are we sure this thing is under 300'? It certainly looks higher based on the newest render and floor count. I thought originally it was something like 312'? Still looks that tall to me.
Given that the project is 29 stories, it would appear that 289 feet is the zoning height (i.e., the height to the top of the last occupiable floor). The actual height, including mechanical penthouse, could very well be 312 feet.
Why not just go with a few more floors for extra height then instead of an exaggerated crown? Guess that's too rational.
It's a nimby-mitigation/trickery tactic for adding height.