odurandina
Senior Member
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2015
- Messages
- 5,328
- Reaction score
- 265
I wouldn't be opposed to 45 Worthington if it resurfaced but shitting on a vibrant and desirable neighborhood isn't the way to win followers for your crusade.
You more than most of us have experienced better urban planning than this sleepy part of the Metro.... the aestetic is especially spectacular with the natural, (current) progression of the High Spine on Huntington... outward toward Longwood, JP & Brookline Village.
A tower right there will not be taking a crap on Mission Hill, but rather, will add to and edify its urbanity as a dense centerpiece with minimal impact. The key is building it with parking held to near zero, and at an extreme pricetag.
This 'taking a crap' narrative has been used too easily... The irony in your post is; the metaphor is fitting for the BU Science Bldg.... which at best is just the latest selfish whim from BU, eerily similar to the thinking of the Early '60s West End..... This building is far to anger-inducing, and polarizing to merit serious consideration for construction.
It's especially sad, when BU has the recources to command world class designs, and work toward the creation of an iconic neighborhood.
The construction of this morbid, gratuitous "thing" would be another nail in the coffin for BU--when it seemed they just might be turning a corner.
Last edited: