Re: Gov't Center Garage Redevelopment
Councilor slams Government Center tower plan
Spotlight on Boston garage sale
By Thomas Grillo
Monday, January 19, 2009
The proposed redevelopment of the Government Center Garage may become a political issue in the upcoming mayoral race.
Boston City Councilor Michael F. Flaherty has raised objections to turning over two city-owned buildings to a developer to make way for the $2.3 billion redevelopment of the seven-story garage.
Flaherty, a potential challenger to Mayor Thomas M. Menino, railed against the idea of razing the District A-1 Police Headquarters and a social service agency adjacent to the garage at a recent community meeting. The police station underwent a $4.8 million renovation in 2006.
In neighborhood meetings last year, Steven Kasnet, chief executive at Raymond Property Co., told both North and West End residents that the Boston Redevelopment Authority asked them to include the two buildings on New Sudbury Street in plans for the 3.3 million-square-foot, mixed-use project that includes a 52-story office building. Under the plan, the city buildings would be demolished to boost the project?s footprint.
While BRA staff, who attended those sessions, did not disagree, the BRA is now requiring that Raymond prove why the developer should be allowed to expand the project?s footprint to include those city-owned parcels. Some are suggesting the move may be an effort to defuse a possible campaign issue if Flaherty enters the race for mayor.
?The Raymond team said the BRA was interested in having them consider those city-owned parcels,? said David Kubiak, a member of the North End/Waterfront Residents? Association who attended several meetings on the project. ?But Mr. Flaherty?s objections appear to be the reason for the BRA?s change in position. The councilor has shined a light on an issue that needs to be vetted.?
But John F. Palmieri, BRA director, denied that the BRA encouraged Raymond to consider the city-owned parcels. He also dismissed suggestions that criticism from Flaherty had anything to do with asking Raymond to prove why the idea makes sense for the city.
?There was never any intention on our part to direct Raymond to include those city parcels,? Palmieri said. ?We were not the ones who told them to do it. They wanted to include them to get the square footage they need for the project.?
On Friday, Justine Griffin, a Raymond spokeswoman, said via e-mail that including the city parcels was the developer?s idea. ?Raymond has always been very interested in the city-owned buildings, and they brought it up early in discussions with the BRA.? She added, ?the BRA was willing to allow them to explore it.?
Meanwhile Flaherty took credit for the BRA?s stance. The at-large councilor said he raised the issue months ago. ?We need to stop letting developers decide what is best for the community,? he said
Link