- Joined
- Jan 7, 2012
- Messages
- 13,989
- Reaction score
- 22,124








Honestly in person it looks fine except for that mismatched square of black bricks in pic 1
Do we want to make settling for merely "inoffensive" a habit? No.
I think it was inspired by the CAT vent, but OK.BPDA: "We want contextual architecture that is inspired by the neighborhood."
Developer: "OK. This is inspired by the Dock Square Garage."
Bro that's been Boston's MO for at least a couple decades. Remember the Great Beige Precast Era of 2006? The "contuextualism" of the '90s?
Having said that I do agree with "Honestly in person it looks fine"
Absolutely true. But this particular building isn't the hill I'd die on to protest the trend. It's a filler building that's fine in person and it's going to activate a long dead but very prominent space in the city.
Seems like a current fad in architecture is to arbitrarily throw in a different façade on part of a building to allegedly break up the monotony. Oftentimes that's worse than just going with the same façade throughout, as demonstrated here ^.If it was clad entirely in those red brick panels it would have been a perfectly average brick lowrise amongst a sea of anonymous brick lowrises. The shitty black panels really throw the whole thing off though. Not sure what happened there, hopefully the trim cleans it up a bit. Overall though its not hideous like some white precast staggered window lowrise abomination could have been, but its crappily average. Average is always better than turd, but it could have been a better average. The south face is much better than the north.