General MBTA Topics (Multi Modal, Budget, MassDOT)

Back in the day my regular commute involved the 57 out of Kenmore. I remember bus drivers seemingly waiting until the next 57 went so that they could tailgate it all the way to Watertown. I wonder if the addition of GPS for real time bus location tracking had an impact in that behavior.
 
They have finally opened the gate at Quincy Adams:

With less than 500 feet of pedestrian infrastructure, thousands of commutes around Greater Boston are set to soon improve.

It started Monday morning on the South Shore, where a 200-foot walkway between the Quincy Adams Red Line station and the next-door neighborhood was opened to pedestrians for the first time in three decades.

The locked black gate has been closed for the long period because of concerns that it would encourage people to park in the residential neighborhood during the day. Barred from a short walk to the Red Line, neighbors who ride the Red Line have instead been forced to either take a long, roundabout walk of more than a mile to access the station on the other side, or get a ride there.

You can see the existing absurdity in the Google walking directions.
 
A similarly absurd situation exists in Woburn. I'd love to take my bike on the train and ride it from Anderson via the mostly quiet back roads and wide dirt paths through the conservation land between there and my parents' place near the Mill Pond Reservoir in Burlington (or walk for that matter), but the only route out of there more than doubles the actual distance and is along frighteningly pedestrian and bike unfriendly roadways.
 
Woburn is looking to rebuild the New Boston Street bridge about 1500 feet north of the station. While the best solution is obviously extending the existing pedestrian bridge at the station, the New Boston Street bridge and a new path from the station would vastly reduce the current detour.
 
Woburn is looking to rebuild the New Boston Street bridge about 1500 feet north of the station. While the best solution is obviously extending the existing pedestrian bridge at the station, the New Boston Street bridge and a new path from the station would vastly reduce the current detour.
The article also says they're looking at a direct connection to the station from the west side. Sure wish that was there when I served on a jury at Middlesex Superior Court a couple months ago. The first day I took the bike up to Mishawum and rode over and that was fine, but got out too late for the one train back that stops there, had to ride to Anderson and swore I was never doing that again. (And I regularly bike commuted to Kendall Square for six years, and to Boston for a few months.) The next two days I left the bike at home, walked to the courthouse from Mishawum, and took a Lyft to Anderson to get home. Even just the New Boston St connection would have made it doable by bike.
 
And don't get me started about Sullivan (which I commuted through for a few years); it absolutely boggles me the way it completely turns its back on the dense residential neighborhood right next to it.
 
And don't get me started about Sullivan (which I commuted through for a few years); it absolutely boggles me the way it completely turns its back on the dense residential neighborhood right next to it.

Tell me about it. I lived about 5 blocks up Perkins for 2-1/2 years and felt the daily despair of my walk to the station being literally twice as long as it needed to be.
 
Ramirez out

MBTA general manager Luis Ramirez is out after just 15 months in the job.

[...]

Steve Poftak, the vice chairman of the T’s governing board and the head of a public policy institute at Harvard University, will take over as the general manager. He previously served as the interim general manager for about two months prior to Ramirez’s hiring.
 

As expected (though 80% of this board disagreed with me).

Ramirez had no experience in public transit, the public sector, or even working in Boston.

HBS would like you to think that "anyone can manage anything with the right basic managerial skills." That is an MBA program sales pitch, not reality.

Pertinent experience absolutely counts. My stance was and still is: set the hiring bar high, and insist on having both.
 
As expected (though 80% of this board disagreed with me).

HBS would like you to think that "anyone can manage anything with the right basic managerial skills." That is an MBA program sales pitch, not reality.

Pertinent experience absolutely counts. My stance was and still is: set the hiring bar high, and insist on having both.

My recollection was that this board pretty much unanimously agreed that he wasn't the right guy for the job. And for all the "MBA" talk, the guy doesn't even have a damn MBA!
 
^ I was talking about the "managerial skills are general" "a competent manager can manage anything" pushback I got when I cited his lack of transit experience.
 
^ I was talking about the "managerial skills are general" "a competent manager can manage anything" pushback I got when I cited his lack of transit experience.

Fair enough. My stance from that start is that a competent manager may be able to manage anything to some extent (and fix some of the T's issues) but Ramirez never showed himself to be a competent manager.

The T needs to either hire a transit expert or hire a proven successful manager of a large complex organization. Obviously in the perfect world the T would find both in the same person. But Ramirez's CV shows him to be neither.
 
So, any opinions on Poftak as the replacement GM?

I've had a decent impression of him from watching some of the FMCB meetings and seeing the sorts of questions he's asked/comments he's made, but that's my only knowledge of him.
 
Agreed. A manager with high overall competence can surround themselves with experts - some of Amtrak's good CEOs didn't have railroad experience, but spent a lot of time listening to those who do - but a top-tier transit agency like the MBTA really should have someone who's both a good manager and a transit professional. Ramirez, to the surprise of no one, was neither.
 
Big news from NYC:

For the past 50 years, management has constantly slowed down trains by adding unnecessary speed restrictions in the name of safety. Over time, these speed restrictions have only gotten worse and longer. Additionally, faulty devices meant that trains had to go below the speed limits set to avoid tripping up the red signals by mistake.

NYT Article:
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/10/nyregion/new-york-subway-delay.html

More than two decades later, those rules have slowed down trains more than is necessary for safety, which contributes to a system plagued by delays.

Now the subway’s leader, Andy Byford, is changing the rules in some areas to speed up trains as part of a major effort to improve service for frustrated riders. Over the weekend, the speed limit was raised on parts of two lines in Brooklyn — the N and R trains — from 15 miles per hour to as much as 30 miles per hour. Other lines will be sped up in coming months.

“We want to keep pushing trains through the pipe and moving them,” Mr. Byford said in an interview. He outlined his plans on Monday to the Metropolitan Transportation Authority’s board, which oversees the system.

The changes to the speed limit are one piece of Mr. Byford’s sweeping plans to turn around service and modernize a system that descended into crisis last year. Workers have also started to replace faulty signals that trigger a train’s emergency brakes at low speeds, a problem investigated by The New York Times and The Village Voice that has also led to slower service.

Subway riders often wonder why an express train suddenly crawls along slowly instead of zooming to the next stop. Slow train speeds are less disruptive than major delays caused by train breakdowns and sick passengers, but they have added to the feeling that the system is constantly delayed.

Mr. Byford says he is confident that trains can travel safely at higher speeds and that fixing the balky signals will allow train operators to travel at the correct speeds.


Why am I posting this?

Because surely the MBTA had had the same problems - especially on the Green Line.

Such as places where trolleys have to stop, even though parralel car traffic can blast through.

https://goo.gl/maps/tm7FcMQ6cA12

Advocates need to push for a system wide review.

Is the red line still crawling across the brand new bridge?
 
Advocates need to push for a system wide review.

Is the red line still crawling across the brand new bridge?

A system wide review is in the works. Now, this is the MBTA, and I can't tell you if they're actually going to use this review to fix the unnecessary speed restrictions right away, but over time, they will get better at keeping the speed restrictions updated or at least make sense. I don't want to comment any further on how this will happen, because the plans are still in the works.

Faulty signals will be entirely replaced with the new, simpler and more high-tech signals being installed on the orange and red lines at a cost of $218m, as well as the green line D branch, and they have a contract going out for bid for the blue line in the next year or so. Plans are in the works for the entire central/downtown subway signal system to be updated. In addition, with the exhaustive and comprehensive green line retrofit coming in the next 5-10 years, they will have to analyze these speed restrictions and signal issues.

And yes, the Red Line has been painfully crawling across the Longfellow, at least when I'm riding..
 
You'll have to wait for the Green Line Transformation study to come out in 2019. FCMB has been presented with a few slides of what they're tackling, but still too early for any meaty details. That report is what's going to ID the signal speed-ups, the new Type 10 specs, and other sweeping system mods. Short-term they'll be tweaking signals to close up some slow zones. Full signal replacement and conversion to new technology is going to be stepped out on the later stages of the agenda because of the delicate nature of dispatching in the Central Subway and risk that a speed-enforcement or CBTC system will screw with default headways. To even project what the options are they have to have precise modeling of what schedules the longer trains will keep with all-doors Proof-of-Payment, surface signal priority, etc. Those are numbers they're still crunching, so premature to be making any predictions on what/when for the signals. But they aren't standing still, as the D reconstruction is replacing old copper signal cable with new high-bandwidth fiber optic that'll be able to feed a future signal system, and North Station-to-GLX will have it with ongoing construction.


Red/Orange as widely reported are getting total signal recalibration after the new, faster-accelerating cars have arrived. Optimizations will not go live until after all old cars have been retired, because the optimizations won't work well with mixed fleets of mixed performance profiles. It'll still be the same ATO system--tweaked--but they are likewise installing fiber end-to-end on both lines in all places that don't yet have it. That will give them the bandwidth to be able to transition later to a future signal system of their choice, like CBTC/moving-block. CBTC is mainly a central dispatch computer investment; the field hardware installs are pretty sparse if you already have the fiber run. Thus, they're getting the most labor-intensive field work done now and buying themselves a little more flex to evaluating the back-office technologies for the future.


Blue's signal review is happening as part of the BL Resiliency study for sea level rise. The current mechanical trip-stops are very vulnerable to water because of the heaters and motors installed at every signal block, and all the associated feeder cables that could get fried by a water intrusion. With hundreds of these trip-stop installations and supporting infrastructure across the line, Blue signals are the #1 most flood- and storm-vulnerable infrastructure on the rapid transit system. So Priority #1 for flood protection is getting rid of all that extra electrical/mechanical cruft, and likewise doing a complete copper-for-fiber replacement of communications cable (where fiber doesn't corrode or short). Red/Orange-style ATO would eliminate an enormous amount of Blue's signal hardware...and requires only periodic placement of low-voltage track circuit transmitters. CBTC does even better since its transmitters are wireless and can either be mounted well above track level or encased in water-tight plastic at track level. That makes Blue particularly attractive as the T's CBTC test bed. It's entirely possible they do it there first, then port it to Orange/Red afterwards. This Resiliency study is likewise in its infancy, but should provide some good discussion grist (albeit not as squarely performance-oriented as the goings-on with the other 3 lines) next year.
 

Back
Top