Re: YMCA/ Northeastern Dorm (formerly GrandMarc at St. Botolph)
If you haven't already, joegenius, read this article about rental costs in Boston:
http://boston.com/realestate/news/2...even-higher/sxzxKHQWw4uwibbyzGbzyL/story.html
What merits "hooray" you ask?
- Northeastern is finally closer to removing 720 students from a waiting list to live in student housing... closer to offering a more "affordable" rate to these students than the unbelievably swollen prices of area apartments offering the same list of amenities (security, new construction, central air, green materials, modern technologies, bicycle storage, etc.).
- A seven-year saga to construct a building here has an end within reach.
- The green line E-branch corridor is progressing in meeting its ridership potential by continuing development of this density within walking distance of the stations.
- Thanks to this deal with Phoenix Developers, the Huntington Avenue YMCA branch has the funds it needs (not wants--NEEDS) to give its members facility improvements that have been long overdue. I've been in this YMCA, and I cannot understand for the life of me why current YMCA members were apathetic to the deplorable conditions throughout this building. In the next 2 years that Y members are allowed FREE use of Northeastern's undeniably far-superior Marino Recreation Center, I'll be dumfounded if YMCA "geniuses" like you continue to diatribe my alma mater.
This is a victory for the YMCA.
This is a victory for Northeastern University.
This is a victory for the Fenway community.
This is progress. To summarize my tenured professor's course on human development and globalization in three words: "Adapt or die."
To answer your assertions:
-This project will not have any effect on the availability or prices of Apartments in the East Fenway neighborhood that I have resided in for 31 of the last 34 years. ! bedroom apartments are available on Westland Ave. for $2200 I am acquainted with 3 students who split this. The Greenhouse goes for about $2500. this 3 ways. Northeastern has come up in the market over the years. The demographic it attracts, much of which is international, is well off enough so that "pricing out" students is unlikely at best. I lived at 24 Haviland St. for more than 19 years. When I moved in Berklee kids ate Ramen. by the time I left in 2009 they had Merry Maids cleaning their apartments.
-Methinks that the Fenway's student population will be much larger in 5 years as the social opportunities for students created by sheer numbers will grow.
-Whatever effect this project has will be for about 3 years until the time that NU's required 2 years in the dorm is finished. Students will always want freedom and no-smoking, no-drinking in dorms will not cut it.
-"Apathy"? YMCA members in my social circle have been very vocal for at least the last 5 years about the deferred maintenance of the gym. The Y should have mounted a capital drive 10 years ago. Indeed 1998-99 saw the improvements of the new weight room and additional cardio equipment. At that point the Y was a healthy institution and the window of opportunity was open for an appeal to members. Do you know many Y members? Rest assured they have not been pleased by the Y's in/actions of this century. Indeed, many think that this neglect of the facilities was a stratagem to to make the property more attractive to NU from the get-go. the ineptitude of the Y is staggering.
-Was there any competitive bidding? NU and the Y have not responded to questions about the "process" that made NU the sole suitor. Was there any other prospective buyer who would have been able to preserve the gym?
-As mentioned the real losers in this charade will be the teens who are not full-fledged members and are not as of yet able to vote. Yes, I think that NU will be glad that prospective student's families will not see black teens on Huntington Ave.
-The gym to be built will have 6 hoops rather than the 9 of the former gym.
-The one good thing about the new plan is that their will be a recreational pool and a therapeutic pool. This is a true gain.
-What makes it certain that a new Y will be built at all?
-The YMCA has a large number of members over 30. It would be very uncomfortable for them to use the Marino Center. Yes, I do think that most of these folks will be accommodated by other gyms. The teen users will NOT be absorbed by markets.
-The roles of the Boston Zoning Commission and the BRA are 1 and the same. I guess that zoning is a whim. If that is the case than private developers should get the leeway that NU has been afforded.
-It is truly distressing to see that the MISSION HILL GAZETTE reports that the legal challenges to NU have been settled for something in the neighborhood of $500K. There are folks, myself among them who wrote letters, attended meetings, posted flyers...to find that the so-called leaders have negotiated a settlement whose funds go...?
-I attended NU. All through the 80's and 90's NU was a positive presence in the area. that was ages ago. NU is still trading on the "ugly stepchild" reputation that it had in the 70's as a pretext for "saving" the Fenway. i was a member of STOP, Symphony Tenants Organizing Project, as a 20 year old NU student. I am well versed in the history of the East Fens. I remember when it was called "Front of the Fens".
-Yes, I feel the eyelet windows and elevated track of the gym are wonderful. In 2010 William Galvin and the MA Historical commission did as well. They dropped the ball.
-Gee, I think that NU can pull itself together after this "slog" as John Tobin, NU VP for Community Relations and former City Councilor put it.
-Indeed it is Mr. Tobin's assertion, and former State Atty's Ralph Martins's claim that the recession of 2008 made it "economic" to develop NU rather than Gainsborough Garage and Cullinane Hall which it already owned.
-"Adapt or die"? NU should follow that creed.-Oh yeah, wanna bet Cullinane Hall and Gainsborough Garage are developed after the dorm is built?