Oh god no why. Is there seriously no better artwork that they can come up with here?The squiggly signature artwork gets its companion piece (this time vertically oriented):
View attachment 24569
View attachment 24570
View attachment 24571
I think it's just lazy more than anything.
Everybody who I've ever seen walk by it, including myself, has just been confused.what's wrong with it?
I honestly don't know how more people here aren't offended by this.
I'm offended because it (along with a lot of other parts of this project) flies in the face of what MIT said in community meetings for this project. They held a whole bunch of public meetings that were clearly just for show. They didn't take any feedback from it. I get that it wouldn't mean much to people who didn't actively participate in these meetings (I don't know if you did or not), but when a multi-billion dollar plan promises public art in the open space as part of the plan and then crams some very confusing, contextless lights three stories up and calls it a day, it feels kind of like a slap in the face to people who participated.Of all the things in the world -- architecture- or urban design-related -- to be offended by, this seems like a really odd place to take a stand, maybe?
It's "art" -- kind of by definition, some people will like it and others won't. You seemingly don't like this. Fair enough. "Offended"?!?! Yikes.