Equilibria
Senior Member
- Joined
- May 6, 2007
- Messages
- 6,951
- Reaction score
- 7,998
Re: Site in Hub top choice for a soccer stadium
It might be bad form, but it's not bad politics. Telling them sooner would have risked them leaking the Widett site earlier in the year (which the Globe did anyway) and fomenting neighborhood opposition before Boston 2024 had a chance to make their case. Given the history on the site, there's no incentive for the landowners to keep anything they're told to themselves.
Honestly, the best political strategy was probably what they did - get the stated support of Walsh, Patrick, and the moneyed and intellectual elite, present the project as an effective fait accompli, and then present the landowners at Widett as obstructionists. If this is the stadium site and if Boston is selected, I don't think they'll have much of a choice about whether this land is for sale. It's also important to remember that the Widett site was leaked all the way back in the Spring - the landowners' claim that they didn't know about it until October is bit misleading.
FWIW, the MBTA probably would have taken the land at some point anyhow. It's not like they were going to be there forever.
It's amazing to me that the Olympic Exploratory Committee has been keeping business interests, which would be greatly affected by their site proposals, out of the loop. It's really bad form and bad politics.
It might be bad form, but it's not bad politics. Telling them sooner would have risked them leaking the Widett site earlier in the year (which the Globe did anyway) and fomenting neighborhood opposition before Boston 2024 had a chance to make their case. Given the history on the site, there's no incentive for the landowners to keep anything they're told to themselves.
Honestly, the best political strategy was probably what they did - get the stated support of Walsh, Patrick, and the moneyed and intellectual elite, present the project as an effective fait accompli, and then present the landowners at Widett as obstructionists. If this is the stadium site and if Boston is selected, I don't think they'll have much of a choice about whether this land is for sale. It's also important to remember that the Widett site was leaked all the way back in the Spring - the landowners' claim that they didn't know about it until October is bit misleading.
FWIW, the MBTA probably would have taken the land at some point anyhow. It's not like they were going to be there forever.