Re: Site in Hub top choice for a soccer stadium
Could this be related?: https://www.boston.gov/public-notices/47921
Could this be related?: https://www.boston.gov/public-notices/47921
Any update since the City Council hearing?
Uh, this is Marty Walsh we're talking about...I'm skeptical about the city dealing land to Bob Kraft.... is it really going to be fair market value? At least with private land holders you know it will be
Today's hearing (all 1 hour, 22 minutes ..)
Can someone summarize this please? Is it all of the city property (tow lot, dpw yard, etc)?
350 to 375 feet by FAA map.
The price they get for this property has to pay the costs of building a new facility(ies) somewhere else. I didn't watch the hearing, but I assume that the city has identified potential city-owned site(s) elsewhere on which to build the new replacement facility(ies).
This particular parcel is not desirable for residential -- given the highways on one side and the railroad/subway tracks on the other. A few blocks further north illustrates what gets built residentially when housing is sited butt-end up to this major highway grid.
If they had decked over the tracks as proposed for the Olympics, then this parcel becomes more interesting and valuable. Otherwise, not.
Which means this location is a non-starter for the stadium. The Stadium itself will cost well north of $100 million, this would mean the Revs stadium would be the most expensive in MLS history.
Not so. DC United's stadium cost at least $400 million for 20,000 seats.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2018/sports/dc-united-stadium/
Further from a subway stop than the Frontage Rd. site. About 3,700 parking spaces but none of these were built as part of the stadium.
Damn, over $400 million for an MLS stadium is insane.