Re: 120 Kingston, 29 Story Tower in Chinatown
Regarding: "The biggest change with parking is that the number of spaces has declined from 160 to 95 to 70."
On another thread it's stated that the groundfloor is what really matters, don't look so much at the architecture. Don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good.
But when we look at the ground floor, the bar is further lowered to suggest the project is fine as long as it is "demonstrably better" than the prior proposal. A groundfloor with ramps and above grade parking is acceptable because 5 floors of parking is now 3 floor.
So which is it on ArchBoston -- A) architecture matters, B) ground floor matters, or C) nothing really matters as long as stuff gets built?
I look at what the BRA is handing to the property owner ON THIS SITE and I'm going with A & B.
And BostonUrbEx, too bad if you heard it before. The pattern exists and the pattern is troublesome.
Regarding: "The biggest change with parking is that the number of spaces has declined from 160 to 95 to 70."
Here is the focus regarding parking. The new design is demonstrably better.
On another thread it's stated that the groundfloor is what really matters, don't look so much at the architecture. Don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good.
But when we look at the ground floor, the bar is further lowered to suggest the project is fine as long as it is "demonstrably better" than the prior proposal. A groundfloor with ramps and above grade parking is acceptable because 5 floors of parking is now 3 floor.
So which is it on ArchBoston -- A) architecture matters, B) ground floor matters, or C) nothing really matters as long as stuff gets built?
I look at what the BRA is handing to the property owner ON THIS SITE and I'm going with A & B.
And BostonUrbEx, too bad if you heard it before. The pattern exists and the pattern is troublesome.