whighlander
Senior Member
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2006
- Messages
- 7,812
- Reaction score
- 647
Re: Silver Line to Chelsea (Study Meeting)
Shep -- sometimes the "Private Place Name" is just more identifiable and iconic than some generic street name or worse:
for example:
So it seems that a well known name {even if Private} is most appropriate for lines whose running route is somewhat arbitrary
Finally, I'd like to bang a tired trope that I keep coming back to on this forum. Goddamn stupid place names. Why do we need a terminal station on our T maps called Mystic Mall? Ugh. Why should we enshrine private place names in public transit, especially "malls" that really are just parking lots? Was the name "Everett Avenue" taken? Sadly, I send lots of letters about these kind of things and never get a response (sad both because of how I spend my time and the degree to which anyone else cares).
Shep -- sometimes the "Private Place Name" is just more identifiable and iconic than some generic street name or worse:
for example:
- easy to id locations --many of which are "Private Names":
- South Station
- North Station
- Airport
- Government Center
- DTX
- MFA
- Symphony
- Aquarium
- Science Park
- Harvard and other misc. Square names
- less obvious
- less well known destinations such as Beachmont, Oak Grove
- the vast majority of stations typically named after a street which would be ambiguous except for the fact that the line follows a particular street such as Commonwealth or Huntington and so the cross is unique
- Ambiguous if you didn't already know where they are located as they are either long streets or names which occur on multiple possible streets
- State St.
- Mass Ave.
- Broadway
- Green St.
- Ruggles
So it seems that a well known name {even if Private} is most appropriate for lines whose running route is somewhat arbitrary