Silver Line to Chelsea

Re: Silver Line to Chelsea (Study Meeting)

Finally, I'd like to bang a tired trope that I keep coming back to on this forum. Goddamn stupid place names. Why do we need a terminal station on our T maps called Mystic Mall? Ugh. Why should we enshrine private place names in public transit, especially "malls" that really are just parking lots? Was the name "Everett Avenue" taken? Sadly, I send lots of letters about these kind of things and never get a response (sad both because of how I spend my time and the degree to which anyone else cares).

Shep -- sometimes the "Private Place Name" is just more identifiable and iconic than some generic street name or worse:

for example:
  • easy to id locations --many of which are "Private Names":
    • South Station
    • North Station
    • Airport
    • Government Center
    • DTX
    • MFA
    • Symphony
    • Aquarium
    • Science Park
    • Harvard and other misc. Square names
  • less obvious
    • less well known destinations such as Beachmont, Oak Grove
    • the vast majority of stations typically named after a street which would be ambiguous except for the fact that the line follows a particular street such as Commonwealth or Huntington and so the cross is unique
  • Ambiguous if you didn't already know where they are located as they are either long streets or names which occur on multiple possible streets
    • State St.
    • Mass Ave.
    • Broadway
    • Green St.
    • Ruggles

So it seems that a well known name {even if Private} is most appropriate for lines whose running route is somewhat arbitrary
 
Re: Silver Line to Chelsea (Study Meeting)

F-Line as a permanent terminus set up I think your design is pretty good but considering there are probably plans to extend this past here at some point I don't think that design is very good at future proofing. It would create a situation similar to the D Street crossing eventually when the silver line or green line or both are extended beyond here. I do think street access is a good idea but I'm not sure this is the best solution. I am going to look some more at some options I had thought of.

The only way to get it west of there is to switch sides to the north side of the Eastern Route, because the freight storage tracks for Everett Terminal start at the 2nd Ave. grade crossing. So, no...you aren't wrapping this around to Everett Casino as BRT without property takings at 3rd and 2nd at the back corner of the State Garden factory and the scrap yard to build big honking busway flyover ramps. No tunnel, because there's an underground stream. And ramps from 2nd towering over the scrapyards, not over the bedroom windows of the houses behind Santilli Circle. If it were trolley you could squeeze a little bit further west of the stream and do a low-profile Wellington/Orange Line-style duck-under at steep grade, but ramps are the only way it's going to go with BRT geometry.


Getting from the Mall to the Casino is going to exceed cost of getting to the Mall in the first place, so that is not going to happen anytime soon. If there needs to be a casino bus off this route, it's banging a right on Everett off the loop and another pair of rights on Spruce and Beacham to get there. Which is why a design that doesn't preclude banging a right is essential here. Finishing the circuit around Everett or--across the Mystic--is an Urban Ring-level investment for Urban Ring-ish ridership and headways, not an SL Gateway Phase II tack-on. So you're going to have a loop here at the Mall for 20+ years. That's a given.


I'm not really sure what precludes further extension. This a few thousand pounds of asphalt and a prefab bus shelter we're talking. There's no buildings being shivved between the tracks and the turnout aligning with the loop driveway, and asphalt and corrugated metal are pretty disposable materials. Eliminating the grade crossing's going to be an ironclad requirement for continuing the wrap-around west because of the additional headways that'll send through all this congestion, so pavement's going to get raised in elevation from here to the tracks to build that road overpass when the time comes. They better not be thinking more than asphalt and prefab shelters knowing that's someday going to be in the cards. And from the looks of the rendering (other than that superfluous second platform) there isn't a whole lot in the way of structures...just asphalt. As it should be for future considerations.
 
Re: Silver Line to Chelsea (Study Meeting)

Thanks for the information. In light of that revelation I think your plan does makes sense.

I don't get having two platforms either at a terminal like that it makes no sense.
 
Re: Silver Line to Chelsea (Study Meeting)

Re Place Names: I get more annoyed about "fancy" names for new streets. There are a few of them in the Seaport District. "Marina Park Drive" sounds like some place in Palm Fucking Beach. Who was responsible for that disgrace?
 
Re: Silver Line to Chelsea (Study Meeting)

Re Place Names: I get more annoyed about "fancy" names for new streets. There are a few of them in the Seaport District. "Marina Park Drive" sounds like some place in Palm Fucking Beach. Who was responsible for that disgrace?

The Seaport will actually have a Palm Beach style marina.
 
Re: Silver Line to Chelsea (Study Meeting)

If they're going to go all pseudo Palm Beach out there, they ought to throw some New England snark into the mix, name a few streets "Blizzard Beach Boulevard" or rename D Street "Vitamin D Deprivation Street". Keep it real.

They could have the streets running NW to SE all named with balmy sounding names, and name the SW - NE streets with wintry names. So you could stand at the corner of Summer and Blizzard, it would match the Summer to Winter changeover in DTX. That could even be pitched as "traditional".

If we lose our sarcasm, we lose our souls, and might as well move to the real Palm Beach and take up golf.
 
Re: Silver Line to Chelsea (Study Meeting)

"SoBo"

Remember when the Globe tried to make that a thing? It ended up becoming a Pavlovian experiment for starting a "Yankees Suck" chant on-demand.
 
Re: Silver Line to Chelsea (Study Meeting)

"SoBo"

Remember when the Globe tried to make that a thing? It ended up becoming a Pavlovian experiment for starting a "Yankees Suck" chant on-demand.

I think they should get the guy who did the Highway Info Boards with things such as Wicked Pissah Wintah
 
Re: Silver Line to Chelsea (Study Meeting)

Shep -- sometimes the "Private Place Name" is just more identifiable and iconic than some generic street name or worse:

for example:
  • easy to id locations --many of which are "Private Names":
    • South Station
    • North Station
    • Airport
    • Government Center
    • DTX
    • MFA
    • Symphony
    • Aquarium
    • Science Park
    • Harvard and other misc. Square names
  • less obvious
    • less well known destinations such as Beachmont, Oak Grove
    • the vast majority of stations typically named after a street which would be ambiguous except for the fact that the line follows a particular street such as Commonwealth or Huntington and so the cross is unique
  • Ambiguous if you didn't already know where they are located as they are either long streets or names which occur on multiple possible streets
    • State St.
    • Mass Ave.
    • Broadway
    • Green St.
    • Ruggles

So it seems that a well known name {even if Private} is most appropriate for lines whose running route is somewhat arbitrary

Which is why "Silver Line Way" is so goddamn STUPID
 
Re: Silver Line to Chelsea (Study Meeting)

The transitway seems to like having stations named after destinations that are at least a big fat mega-block away. If "World Trade Center" can get away with that name from 700ft away then "Silver Line Way" should just be called "Liberty Wharf" and be done with it.
 
Re: Silver Line to Chelsea (Study Meeting)

It's a good name because when you arrive there you can't help but realize that bad design decisions are the "Silver Line way".
 
Re: Silver Line to Chelsea (Study Meeting)

It's a good name because when you arrive there you can't help but realize that bad design decisions are the "Silver Line way".

Should Be "F*****g Slow Bus Stop" or

"Deja Vu All Over Again"
(as in remember World Trade Center Stop? Well, we are going past it again, TWICE, before we take you to the airport...)
 
Re: Silver Line to Chelsea (Study Meeting)

Should Be "F*****g Slow Bus Stop" or

"Deja Vu All Over Again"
(as in remember World Trade Center Stop? Well, we are going past it again, TWICE, before we take you to the airport...)

The best part is how they actually stop twice at WTC coming inbound. :rolleyes:
 
Re: Silver Line to Chelsea (Study Meeting)

*walks in with tail between his legs*

SO I am probably the *last* person who should be posting here however...

After several people, some regulars on here, plus some lurkers of this site (who are close friends) talked to me directly (and a few that gave me a reality check) I'm going to open my big mouth and insert BOTH my feet. And then I'm gonna on my knees and profusely apologize to everyone.

Just know that it was a really bad day all around yesterday for me, and I think this site (and a few people unrelated to here) got the brunt of my extreme grumpiness. So it wasn't you, it was me. I will try refrain from that in the future, as I do want to contribute here (if you'll let me) because after reading some of the previous posts and talking with a few fellow AB members elsewhere, I really can answer many, many questions about this project and bring a lot to this thread (and forum). And I want to be apart of that. So again, please accept my very sincere apologies.

With that said, I've unlocked the original album on flickr and restored the previous post with all the pictures (post is on page 13 ). Luckily, I write all my better posts in notepad before I post (and save them!) so the post wasn't lost. So it's back. Enjoy. And yes I will go take pictures again in a few weeks and post them here also. (and no, I wont remove them in a huff after!) I feel I need to now, as it's going to be very exciting to see it come together very quickly and that's something that I'd like to share that here in picture essays!

And now that is behind us.. I do feel the need to reply to a few things I've seen in the last few previous posts.

F Line's re-configuration of the intersection with Everett Ave:

I want to remind folks of two things, One is that one of the many reasons why this project is moving so fast with short money is that MassDOT owns the ROW already so little to no new land had to be purchased for the busway. So with any changes, while being nice, it wouldn't meet the criteria for the project which is keeping costs down, because to do something like F-Line suggests would add to the cost since it would require taking over part of MGH's parking lot also)

However, I do agree that there's no way (anywhere, except Eastern Ave Station busway entrance) for the buses to leave the busway, but as I understand it, the buses will not layover at Mystic Mall station. They will just turn around and head back to South Boston in with no layover. And remember, the bus facilities that service the Silver Line are no where near Chelsea, but in South Boston so the buses always would go back into the city before going out of service. And as far as a truly out of service bus that needs a tow, one could assume that the signalized BRT lights that would be at Everett Ave would be controlled in a way NOT to go down while this is happening so the broken bus can be removed out of the busway quickly. Yeah it's a tight corner turn, but in an emergency it could be done.

The other thing to keep in mind is that Mystic Mall station, if reconfigured wouldn't be a straight shot from DT Chelsea station, AND if this is ever extended to further to Wellington (a la Urban Ring), only one platform will need to be re-worked to eliminate the bus loop. (essentially removing the pine trees as seen here). A cost savings move for later.

And yes it could be years before that happens, however, remember how fast this one got started? From Mystic Mall Station to Santilli Circle is just like the this project, an abandoned ROW. SO it could come together for that section very easily. The hard and costly part would be the bridge over the Malden river like you said. One could hope that once this project is finished and the ridership goes up, that extending this to Wellington will eventually happen as another easy win.

And then of course, the other thing to remember is that this is a busway for BRT, so it's not really meant to have the buses divert onto streets unless it's apart of the route and in this design, it's not. Doing that kinda defeats the purpose of a BRT IMHO (other than for having out of service buses leave the busway earlier), plus if you look at other BRT lines in other cities (like LA), any at grade crossing is very similar to what the MassDOT has done here.

I should also add that in early renderings as seen below (from an May 2013 presentation), they did originally plan to have the busway run the entire length of Market Basket and have the loop closer to Third Street with an exit to third for off route, plus a standard Box District platform layout where the busloop is now. I can't find the exact one with the exit to third, but I will keep looking thru my stuff) but the pictures below gives you an idea.

17130000899_7b3009f20f_c.jpg

17315778061_193f5a8ba6_b.jpg


Now as far as "Mystic Mall" Station...

And for the record, I agree this is a dumb name, but it does describe the station's real location. It is on the edge of the mall property. Although most people, myself included, call this mall "Market Basket Mall" since the main reason to come here is to go to Market Basket. So I guess "Mystic Mall" is better than actually calling it "Market Basket Station" which is probably what the 'locals' will call it. LOL

A better name would be West Chelsea Station.. and would give that part of Chelsea it's own identity. And I wouldn't be surprised if the station's name eventually changed. There is a community group/facebook page trying to change that area (and Admiral's Hill) to the "West Chelsea" name. That area is Chelsea's last area that can be 'redeveloped' (think more condos). There's already a large complex going in where the Chelsea Clock Company is on Everett Ave behind Stop & Shop (a 5 minute walk from Mystic Mall Station) and I am sure more will follow. Its just a wasteland behind over there and its inevetiable that area will eventually be re-developed.
 
Re: Silver Line to Chelsea (Study Meeting)

*walks in with tail between his legs*

SO I am probably the *last* person who should be posting here however...



Now as far as "Mystic Mall" Station...

And for the record, I agree this is a dumb name, but it does describe the station's real location. It is on the edge of the mall property. Although most people, myself included, call this mall "Market Basket Mall" since the main reason to come here is to go to Market Basket. So I guess "Mystic Mall" is better than actually calling it "Market Basket Station" which is probably what the 'locals' will call it. LOL

A better name would be West Chelsea Station.. and would give that part of Chelsea it's own identity. And I wouldn't be surprised if the station's name eventually changed. There is a community group/facebook page trying to change that area (and Admiral's Hill) to the "West Chelsea" name. That area is Chelsea's last area that can be 'redeveloped' (think more condos). There's already a large complex going in where the Chelsea Clock Company is on Everett Ave behind Stop & Shop (a 5 minute walk from Mystic Mall Station) and I am sure more will follow. Its just a wasteland behind over there and its inevetiable that area will eventually be re-developed.

Cybah -- great to see you back ... its always nice to have contributions which are more factual and less opinion to balance the other ones

You've got to realize that AB Forumers take pot shots at anything newly submitted as a target of opportunity -- no offence its just the AB Forum Way

The other thing is to try excessively hard to make a pun thus

When you mentioned the complex going in where Chelsea Clock was ... the obvious station name suggested itself .......... drum roll please


Clock Stop

:)
 
Re: Silver Line to Chelsea (Study Meeting)

When you mentioned the complex going in where Chelsea Clock was ... the obvious station name suggested itself .......... drum roll please

Clock Stop

:)

haha while it's a cute name.. the building is actually being torn down (story) to make way for this complex. And the complex isn't next to the station, it's about a block or so away (closer to the Hess and CHS)

And yes I know people on here like to take pot shots, it just gets annoying sometimes but for the good of the forum and spreading correct information, I'm here and I'll live with it.
 
Re: Silver Line to Chelsea (Study Meeting)

How long do you think it will be before the broadway bridge needs replacing and they could widen the busway to have two lanes and get rid of the pinch point?
 
Re: Silver Line to Chelsea (Study Meeting)

How long do you think it will be before the broadway bridge needs replacing and they could widen the busway to have two lanes and get rid of the pinch point?

I actually don't think the pinch point will be that bad. It's going to be signaled so maybe a minute dwell time, plus I think the headways are such that it'll be rare that two buses will be at that point at the same time.

When I took photos, I didn't catch that year the Broadway bridge was built, but Bellingham Street bridge was built in 1993 so it's relatively new. And since the Broadway bridge is the same style construction (vs Washington Ave) as seen here, I'm going to assume 70s-80s-90s era (but I'll go check tonight after work).. far 'younger' than the Everett Ave bridge.

Edit: I went and looked at the year stamp on the bridge after work, and I was right. 1987. (see below). Which then begs the question, if the Bellingham St bridge was done in 1993, and the Broadway bridge in 1987, why wasn't the Washington Ave bridge ever done?

17323796572_74dc6e44c1_z.jpg
 
Last edited:

Back
Top