State Street HQ | One Congress | Bulfinch Crossing | West End

chrisbrat

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2015
Messages
1,186
Reaction score
957
in that video, they can't seem to land on whether the MP will be white or black (in fairness, in most shots it's white).
 

BeeLine

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jan 7, 2012
Messages
12,806
Reaction score
13,418
IMG_6297 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_6298 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_6299 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_6303 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_6304 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_6309 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_6310 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_6322 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_6331 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_6332 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_6337 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_6336 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_6345 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_6477 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_6577 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_6581 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_6585 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
 

chrisbrat

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2015
Messages
1,186
Reaction score
957
wasn't it reported waaaaaaay back when -- relatively soon after the first renders were released -- that the scope and shape of the "fins" was going to be scaled back somewhat b/c the initial design was ultimately deemed to be unsafe/unstable in high winds?

i do not recall the source (or even if it happened. maybe i'm conflating things i've read with conversations i've had since this project was introduced), so i guess take that for whatever it's worth (or not worth). as a concept, it makes a degree of sense to me. the more extreme fins in that render you shared do kind of scream, "go ahead -- just try and blow this glass and steel 'sail' down! oh, it's a port city and the windiest city in america? hubris, you say? the gods themselves couldn't topple this design!!!"
 

DZH22

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2006
Messages
8,532
Reaction score
13,854
The render also doesn't include the mech, so we're visually comparing it against a different roofline. Plus the render isn't looking up at quite as much of an angle. It's close, but it also makes a difference in addition to the mech.
 

BronsonShore

Active Member
Joined
Feb 13, 2014
Messages
217
Reaction score
493
wasn't it reported waaaaaaay back when -- relatively soon after the first renders were released -- that the scope and shape of the "fins" was going to be scaled back somewhat b/c the initial design was ultimately deemed to be unsafe/unstable in high winds?

i do not recall the source (or even if it happened. maybe i'm conflating things i've read with conversations i've had since this project was introduced), so i guess take that for whatever it's worth (or not worth). as a concept, it makes a degree of sense to me. the more extreme fins in that render you shared do kind of scream, "go ahead -- just try and blow this glass and steel 'sail' down! oh, it's a port city and the windiest city in america? hubris, you say? the gods themselves couldn't topple this design!!!"
But it isn't just the part that rises above the roofline that looks diminished to me. There's also less distinction between the glass curves themselves and it all looks kind of flat and fat. I worry that this is just going to look like an oval with a sail on top; the "slit dress" look of the renders isn't coming through to me.
 

atlantaden

Senior Member
Joined
May 31, 2006
Messages
2,290
Reaction score
591
This thing looks great from some angles but sure is a fatty from others:

View attachment 18867
We all seem to have our "good sides" when it comes to having our picture taken. This girl just doesn't have the option of moving when the paparazzi are shooting her. But having said that, even her "Rubenesque" side is strikingly beautiful! 😍
 
Last edited:

A Chicagoan

New member
Joined
Nov 28, 2020
Messages
75
Reaction score
345
The render also doesn't include the mech, so we're visually comparing it against a different roofline. Plus the render isn't looking up at quite as much of an angle. It's close, but it also makes a difference in addition to the mech.
Also the render seems to have a pretty extreme perspective correction applied.
 

Top