Really tall buildings in moderate sized cities like OKC and Indianapolis always come off as desperate and try-hard to me, and they always look goofy on the skyline. Context matters in architecture and I don't think these buildings can be evaluated on their own merit. No matter how nicely they are built I find them grotesque and insulting - like they think the ability to build an 800+ foot building makes them a better city than they are. You aren't fooling anybody.
Indy's is only 700' to the roof, with the 2 twin spires "officially" making it taller than the Hancock. As a hardcore Patriots fan and a hardcore skyscraper enthusiast, I have multiple reasons to despise cheating Indianapolis. Considering that I broke my toe the only time I was ever in that city, I do, in fact, hate the city's guts and everything about the place. It has all the vibrancy of a peanut butter sandwich.