315 on A | 315 A Street | Fort Point

Re: 319 A Street Rear

What a great building. The facade is terracotta, right? How does terracotta compare to precast in terms of cost? Maybe it's just me, but I feel as if terracotta is leading to better looking buildings (this, MassArt, 45 Providence) than other types of precast.
 
Re: 319 A Street Rear

9358713683_ed597542fe_b.jpg


Notice the slight color variations in the terra cotta on the tower portion which gives a pleasing variety of shades without being garish. Compare that with the godawful variations on Waterside place.
 
Re: 319 A Street Rear

And, correct me if I'm wrong, "household" requires a legal family correct? You can't just round up two friends and call yourself a household can you?

Not necessarily. Household is generally defined as a family unit, but with the evolving understanding of "nontraditional family units" (unmarried couples/parents, gay partners prior to gay marriage, etc.) the courts have generally treated anything acting as a family unit (eating meals together, sharing cots, etc.) as being a household. Of course in a housing application you'd have to make that case for yourself.
 
Re: 319 A Street Rear

What a great building. The facade is terracotta, right? How does terracotta compare to precast in terms of cost? Maybe it's just me, but I feel as if terracotta is leading to better looking buildings (this, MassArt, 45 Providence) than other types of precast.

Just a quick clarification: MassArt is actually not terracotta. It's Alucobond (metal paneling).
 
Re: 319 A Street Rear

^ I'm pretty sure the "sharing costs" has to go beyond splitting the rent and utilities. Typical roommates do not make a household.
 
Re: 319 A Street Rear

^ I'm pretty sure the "sharing costs" has to go beyond splitting the rent and utilities. Typical roommates do not make a household.

I agree. The list I cited was merely illustrative and no single factor (besides legal/blood relations) is dispositive of a group of people constituting a family unit. As for "sharing costs", I was more referring to group purchases of food or other tangible assets like furniture or appliances. For instance, housing co-ops often get around zoning laws this way.

When you take a close look at it you''ll see that the courts have tied themselves in knots trying to find a useful definition of "family unit", particularly when the our understanding of it has changed and the outdated definitions contained within our statutes/bylaws/ordinances would lead to ridiculous conclusions (i.e. the recent College Hill decision by the SJC.)
 
Re: 319 A Street Rear

http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/household


Household
Individuals who comprise a family unit and who live together under the same roof; individuals who dwell in the same place and comprise a family, sometimes encompassing domestic help; all those who are under the control of one domestic head.

For the purposes of insurance, the terms family and household are frequently used inter-changeably.

Cross-references
Head of Household.

West's Encyclopedia of American Law, edition 2. Copyright 2008 The Gale Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
household n. a family living together, all of whom need not be related.

Copyright © 1981-2005 by Gerald N. Hill and Kathleen T. Hill. All Right reserved.
 
Re: 319 A Street Rear

^ So that does exclude a bunch of friends rooming together?
 
Re: 319 A Street Rear

So the official name is 315 on A, not 319. Maybe we should update the thread title?
 
Re: 315 on A (formerly 319 A Street Rear)

Anything similar to this in the works for the Fort Point area?
 
Re: 315 on A (formerly 319 A Street Rear)

The messed up part about this is that this is a nice building. However, the people living here have to stare at Waterside Place and the people in Waterside place get to stare at 315 A.
 
Re: 315 on A (formerly 319 A Street Rear)

It is the ToC Paradox
 
Re: 315 on A (formerly 319 A Street Rear)

Not sure of materials, or current status, but 399 Congress has a similar look..

residences%20at%20399-thumb.jpg

It was approved a while ago no idea when construction is starting though.

Same architects - ADD Inc.

good, maybe there will be 2 new attractive buildings in the area. Maybe seaport square will surprise me but I doubt it.
 
Re: 315 on A (formerly 319 A Street Rear)

^it's funny how in just one year everybody has forgotten the awesomeness of Liberty Wharf. So that''s at least 2 nice buildings.
 
Re: 315 on A (formerly 319 A Street Rear)

^it's funny how in just one year everybody has forgotten the awesomeness of Liberty Wharf. So that''s at least 2 nice buildings.

Don't forget about Channel Center. Pwc looks promising as well and im not sure about the general consensus on the ICA.
 

Back
Top