In today's security environment, the O'Neill would not have been located where it is, so no future site where the building sits right on the street.
Is that why it's surrounded by all those concrete balls?
In today's security environment, the O'Neill would not have been located where it is, so no future site where the building sits right on the street.
Yes. Even with those it is too close to the street.Is that why it's surrounded by all those concrete balls?
And for example, the White House, which is not adequate for the job any more, and seemingly not secure from anyone with minimal climbing ability, should be turned into a museum! Probably have a Presidential residence/office in a castle on the grounds on the Naval Observatory?
Many of the Federal agencies that are tenants in the O'Neill FOB are those with a lot of interaction with the public, so any new site has to be readily accessible via mass transit.
In today's security environment, the O'Neill would not have been located where it is, so no future site where the building sits right on the street.
The nice thing about cities is that they are long term projects. Far longer than our lifespans. I have no doubt that someday all the buildings in government center will be so obsolete that replacement is required. When that time comes something new and better will likely rise. There is no need for it to occur soon.
Just walked by this again, one of the construction workers milling around was wearing a hoodie with an enormous Irish Republican army logo on it. Pretty shocking, having grown up here I'm used to your typical provincial Irish extremism but I've never seen anyone so blatantly wearing an IRA anything, let alone it work.
This cement thing pictured in the 2nd to last post is now the foundation for some sort of iron scaffold of a stucture they were putting up today, not sure what it is.
I'd say that looks like a crane base.
How about this?
From atop the 9th floor of the 33 Arch parking garage, per usual.