TheRifleman
Banned
- Joined
- Sep 25, 2008
- Messages
- 4,431
- Reaction score
- 0
Every opinion matters, and we are each allowed our thoughts. However, I do remember WAY WAY WAY back when this was revised from the curved glass tower, most board members were quite happy with the new design. I think it's been said before, but street interaction is very important here and in many other "so called" design turds. I ABSOLUTELY despise the design of Parklane Seaport apartments, but I have to admit......the street retail and sidewalk activation is much better than most developments. So, I give it somewhat of a pass.
IMHO, 888 Boylston is light years ahead of most recent Boston development in design, materials, and street activation. That being said, yes, it could have been taller but I think the BCDC and the PruPac groups cut it down quite a bit.
Everybody does have an opinion. I bolded your comment concerning this is light years ahead.
I think 888 Boylston is not Backbay material. It's futuristic garbage.
When I think of the Backbay and their buildings I think of Prestige, Quality, Buildings that have stood the test of time.
888 Boylston is nothing like this. This would have been a better fit in a Downtown experiment.
Backbay is truly moving to second best in Boston. I'm starting to realize the North End is becoming more desirable location because of the Greenway activation.