I'm quoting myself. Sorry.
I came across this diagram of the plans for Congress Street: Notice that the original plans called for an elevated viaduct over Congress Street from 93 to New Chardon. Could have been worse. Still needs to be rectified and I repeat that this project should include dehighway-ification of Sudbury, New Chardon and Congress.
![]()
I'm quoting myself. Sorry.
I came across this diagram of the plans for Congress Street: Notice that the original plans called for an elevated viaduct over Congress Street from 93 to New Chardon. Could have been worse. Still needs to be rectified and I repeat that this project should include dehighway-ification of Sudbury, New Chardon and Congress.
PS - anyone else remember a few years ago when they changed New Sudbury back to Sudbury?
![]()
Holy hell. Hard to believe it could have been even worse than what we got!
Instead of building Bulfinch Crossing, we'd be arguing about grounding the overpass.
Yup!
I just now noticed, though, that Center Plaza is divided into two - instead of the covered stair we wound up with.
Instead of building Bulfinch Crossing, we'd be arguing about grounding the overpass.
I don't think I've ever seen that...looks great!
Cutting Center Plaza in half frames the Courthouse beautifully.
I agree-loving the Courthouse. It's one of the few actual art-deco "towers" we have here and needs to be restored. I can't believe some height-maniacs want it demolished.
Not to go too far off topic, but I believe we've talked about restoring/renovating the Courthouse in another thread, and it seems like a serious money pit, IIRC. Need a big developer with some big return elsewhere. EDIT: Link. While we're talking about it, it'd be nice to open up Center Plaza almost completely; seems like you'd be able to get a really nice plaza out of it, and then it'll allow for us to fill in City Hall Plaza a bit.
I agree-loving the Courthouse. It's one of the few actual art-deco "towers" we have here and needs to be restored. I can't believe some height-maniacs want it demolished.
I don't think there is a single "height maniac" who has spoken out against preserving the courthouse.
If anything, most would be fighting to keep one of the 2 tallest art-deco towers in the whole city. I think you are blaming the wrong set of people.
Guys there's already a thread for the courthouse:
http://www.archboston.org/community/showthread.php?t=4895
PS - it's second empire, a victorian style, not art deco.
This would be the perfect place to build a Boston 30 park place.
Are they taking this garage down piece by piece just in that one section where the tower is going?
This thing is taking forever.