I'm quoting myself. Sorry.
I came across this diagram of the plans for Congress Street: Notice that the original plans called for an elevated viaduct over Congress Street from 93 to New Chardon. Could have been worse. Still needs to be rectified and I repeat that this project should include dehighway-ification of Sudbury, New Chardon and Congress.
I'm quoting myself. Sorry.
I came across this diagram of the plans for Congress Street: Notice that the original plans called for an elevated viaduct over Congress Street from 93 to New Chardon. Could have been worse. Still needs to be rectified and I repeat that this project should include dehighway-ification of Sudbury, New Chardon and Congress.
PS - anyone else remember a few years ago when they changed New Sudbury back to Sudbury?
Holy hell. Hard to believe it could have been even worse than what we got!
Instead of building Bulfinch Crossing, we'd be arguing about grounding the overpass.
Yup!
I just now noticed, though, that Center Plaza is divided into two - instead of the covered stair we wound up with.
Instead of building Bulfinch Crossing, we'd be arguing about grounding the overpass.
I don't think I've ever seen that...looks great!
Cutting Center Plaza in half frames the Courthouse beautifully.
I agree-loving the Courthouse. It's one of the few actual art-deco "towers" we have here and needs to be restored. I can't believe some height-maniacs want it demolished.
Not to go too far off topic, but I believe we've talked about restoring/renovating the Courthouse in another thread, and it seems like a serious money pit, IIRC. Need a big developer with some big return elsewhere. EDIT: Link. While we're talking about it, it'd be nice to open up Center Plaza almost completely; seems like you'd be able to get a really nice plaza out of it, and then it'll allow for us to fill in City Hall Plaza a bit.
I agree-loving the Courthouse. It's one of the few actual art-deco "towers" we have here and needs to be restored. I can't believe some height-maniacs want it demolished.
I don't think there is a single "height maniac" who has spoken out against preserving the courthouse.
If anything, most would be fighting to keep one of the 2 tallest art-deco towers in the whole city. I think you are blaming the wrong set of people.
Guys there's already a thread for the courthouse:
http://www.archboston.org/community/showthread.php?t=4895
PS - it's second empire, a victorian style, not art deco.
This would be the perfect place to build a Boston 30 park place.
Are they taking this garage down piece by piece just in that one section where the tower is going?
This thing is taking forever.