^^^^
Never said Boston was not a great place. We should be #1
Riff -- natural numbers play a role in these kind of rankings as does the methdology of counting or estimating -- by the way SF's best finished 12th:
"We defined “tourist attractions” as cultural and historical sites, natural landmarks, and officially designated spaces. So Boston’s shop-filled Faneuil Hall Marketplace (est. 1742) made the cut, but not Minnesota’s Mall of America—with 40 million annual visitors it would otherwise have been number one....Attractions that don’t sell tickets gave us estimates as best they could. The Times Square Alliance was able to estimate that 80 percent of the 49 million tourists who visited New York in 2010 passed through Times Square. But Berlin’s East Side Gallery and London’s Trafalgar Square were excluded because their tourism bureaus couldn’t provide estimates that distinguished between visitors and locals.... We also excluded sights that draw almost exclusively religious pilgrims."
I looked through the full list of Top 50 and I can't say that I'm outraged -- but call me a Philistine if you will -- I'm certainly saddend by the fact that the first attraction on the list not all about shopping is Notre Dame at number 13 (13.6 M). Beijing's Forbidden City (#15 - 12.8M) then you pass by a lot more shopping and various Disney attractions (or wanna-bees) until you get to The Great Wall (#26 -- 9 M), Musee du Louve (#29 -- 8.5M), Smithsonian Air & Space (#30 -- 8.3 M), and again a lot more blatant kitsche and rides until a few more museums: Smithsonian Natural History (#34 -- 6.8M), Palace de Versailles (#39 -- 5.9 M), British Museum with the Foster Coutyard (#40 -- 5.8M) and the Metropolitan far down the list (#44 -- 5.2M) with the Colleseum (#46 -- 5.1M) and Tate Modern (#49 -- 5 M) essentially bringing up the rear.
Apparently there are no museums in Chicago (Navy Pier # ), LA (Univrsal Studios, Grauman's Chinese Theatre, ), Tokyo ( ), or SF ( ) which can compete with shopping for refrigerator magnets
Nor apparently is it worth bothering to visit Florence, Amsterdam, St. Petersburg, Madrid, Cairo, Athens, Bilbaoo or Philadelphia for any reason
Maybe I'm just disgusted with the loss of interest / ignorance of our global cultural heritage -- I thiink there might have been a handful of world heritge sites on the list.
So I guess that from an intelectual stimulation / cultural heritage standpoint perhaps we should be grateful for the fraction of the 18 M visiting FH/QM that stop to notice what was begun by John Smibert in the style of an English country market with private funds from Peter Faneuil and then redone by Bulfinch with Federal precision and simplicity. similarly a few might stop to admire Alexander Parris' Quincy Granite Greek Temple Central Market, the inspired city planning by mayor Josia Quincy (who arrange for the construction without debt or use of public Funds) buildiing of QM and Ben Thompson's 1976 re-do encuraged by Kevin White.
Let's hope that there were some who might look-up-close at paintings of Washington, Webster, Hancock, Adams, or any of the other paintings or sculptures upstairs in FH, listen to the Park Service talk, particpate in a "tourist New England Town Meeting" or venure even higher up to the Ancient and Honerable Artillary Company Museum and other exhibts. Some tourists might fall-in with a Park Service tour of other sites on the Fredom Trail. A few tourists might even attend a concert in the Great Hall by the Boston Classicl Orchstra.
This potential cultural bonanza in FH/QM makes it the higest ranking of the 50 Top Tourist sites in terms of Cutural Value X number of vistors!! -- my ranking (westy)
http://www.travelandleisure.com/articles/worlds-most-visited-tourist-attractions
....China ousted Spain as the third most-visited country with 55.7 million foreign arrivals, while France and the U.S. held tight to their first and second place rankings...Disneyland Paris drew the same number of visitors (10.5 million) as Sacré-Coeur, and two of the world’s 10 most-visited tourist attractions are Disney parks. America also dominates our list.....China and India are even bigger than the U.S., but their lack of dependable visitor statistics and limited domestic tourism markets help account for their few attractions on our list. Expect to see more of them over time; already attendance at Beijing’s Forbidden City has surged from 7 million visitors in 2007 to 12.83 million visitors in 2010.
So what is the most-visited tourist attraction in the world? And can 39.2 million people be wrong? Read on to see the results—and an explanation of our methods for calculating it all.
The Methodology: To tally up the world’s most-visited attractions, we gathered the most recent data supplied by the attractions themselves or from government agencies, industry reports, and reputable media outlets. Whenever available we used 2010 data; however, in the case of theme parks and a few other attractions, the most recent attendance numbers were from 2009.
Attractions that don’t sell tickets gave us estimates as best they could. The Times Square Alliance was able to estimate that 80 percent of the 49 million tourists who visited New York in 2010 passed through Times Square. But Berlin’s East Side Gallery and London’s Trafalgar Square were excluded because their tourism bureaus couldn’t provide estimates that distinguished between visitors and locals.
We defined “tourist attractions” as cultural and historical sites, natural landmarks, and officially designated spaces. So Boston’s shop-filled Faneuil Hall Marketplace (est. 1742) made the cut, but not Minnesota’s Mall of America—with 40 million annual visitors it would otherwise have been number one. Short walkways and waterfront promenades also fit our definition of tourist attractions; that disqualified the Blue Ridge Parkway. We also excluded sights that draw almost exclusively religious pilgrims.
—Lyndsey Matthews