Following an attempt to shoot down an Israeli airliner in 2002,[52] all aircraft in the fleet have been equipped with an infrared countermeasures system called Flight Guard, developed by Israeli Aerospace Industries to defend them against anti-aircraft missiles.[53][54][55][56] Although comparable systems such as CAMPS are now available for civilian aircraft, there is no information to date about any other airlines deploying such a system. Switzerland and other European countries have expressed concern that flares dropped by the Israeli system could cause fires in the vicinity of an airport.[57]
I copied this from Wiki (if that's kosher to do here on archBoston) To use your expression, Data, their security is INSANE, and totally justified!! No other airline comes close to El Al's security measures!
Because there isn't. El Al is not part of a major air alliance (Star, One World, Sky) and does not have any agreements with US carriers.
El Al to resume American Airlines partnership
By Doug Cameron
El Al Israel Airlines Ltd. plans to resume its partnership with American Airlines in March, a move allowed by Israel regaining its top-tier aviation-safety rating from U.S. regulators last November.
The airline and rivals were barred from code sharing and expanding U.S. service after the Federal Aviation Administration downgraded Israel to Category 2 safety status in December 2008.
El Al said in a regulatory filing that it planned to resume code sharing with the AMR Corp. unit on March 31, allowing the carriers to cross-sell seats on each other's flights.
The move would boost El Al--the only one of the country's three main carriers to operate U.S. flights--at a time when it faces tougher competition after Israel last year reached an open-skies aviation deal with the EU. Israel has an open-skies pact with the U.S., but its airlines were previously unable to take advantage of the opportunities.
North America accounts for about one-fifth of El Al's total capacity, and Tel Aviv to New York's John F. Kennedy International Airport is its busiest international route, with service to Newark, N.J., ranking fifth. El Al has a limited alliance with JetBlue Airways Group Inc. that doesn't include code-sharing.
787s on order
+ JetBlue Interlining
+ American Codeshare
+ Local Tech/Pharma/Entrepreneurs
= Nice BOS-TLV potential.
787s on order
+ JetBlue Interlining
+ American Codeshare
+ Local Tech/Pharma/Entrepreneurs
= Nice BOS-TLV potential.
When one of the Gulf carriers comes to Boston, it will be a much bigger feather the cap for Massport and Boston. Emirates offers a much larger amount of onward connections to Central Asia, namely India, and Southeast Asia.
So which Mideast city gets a BOS nonstop first? So far its been said not TLV because they don't have enough feed (does AA codeshare + B6 interline change that?), and so far none of the Gulf airlines have started service (despite huge regional/Asian feed but weak alliances).If Turkish jumps into BOS-IST then its another 1-stop option that could be a thorn in the side of EL Al. One of the top 5 connecting destinations for people flying New York-Istanbul on Turkish is Tel Aviv
So which Mideast city gets a BOS nonstop first? So far its been said not TLV because they don't have enough feed (does AA codeshare + B6 interline change that?), and so far none of the Gulf airlines have started service (despite huge regional/Asian feed but weak alliances).
So is Turkish's opportunity the slim gap between the two made up of:
- Being able to connect to TLV as a non-Arab connection
- Having a large "local" population (13m in IST, 73m in Turkey) compared to 2m in Dubai and 8m in all of the UAE.
- Greeks, Jews, and Armenians in Boston, who, though they have no love for the Turks, might still connect on the airline?
So which Mideast city gets a BOS nonstop first? So far its been said not TLV because they don't have enough feed (does AA codeshare + B6 interline change that?), and so far none of the Gulf airlines have started service (despite huge regional/Asian feed but weak alliances).
So is Turkish's opportunity the slim gap between the two made up of:
- Being able to connect to TLV as a non-Arab connection
- Having a large "local" population (13m in IST, 73m in Turkey) compared to 2m in Dubai and 8m in all of the UAE.
- Greeks, Jews, and Armenians in Boston, who, though they have no love for the Turks, might still connect on the airline?
The final nail in the coffin for BOS-TLV is that El Al has such a tiny widebody fleet that is stretched as it is on routes to Beijing, Toronto, New York-JFK, Newark, Los Angeles, Hong Kong, Johannesburg, and Bangkok. But if they're going to add back service to the US, I think they'll go for Chicago, Miami or Washington since each is an important hub located in a larger metropolitan area than BOS.