Cross-posted from the
Reasonable Transit Pitches thread. . .
MassDOT press release:
They're seeking $108M in a federal grant application to kickstart enough B&A Springfield-Worcester upgrades to allow for 2 near-term Inland Route (NHV-SPG-BOS) round-trips. Upgrades include uprating the track class from Class 3 (59 MPH max) to Class 4 (79 MPH max), optimization of some single-track chokepoints (my guess is adding the tri-track siding that the NNEIRI/East-West studies specced by the autorack facility in East Brookfield so the existing double-track segment isn't bogarted by CSX switching moves), and addition of a tri-track siding at the Grafton & Upton interchange in Grafton in MBTA territory so the eastbound mainline track isn't blocked by the midday CSX local. It isn't the full double-tracking that's required by East-West and NNEIRI to allow full schedules, but it's a start. The speed uprate on the existing track is a very big bucket list item.
I think it's a really good and reasonable start. 2 round-trips may not be much (it's about the same as the pre-2004 Inlands schedule), but as we recently found out with
Valley Flyer once service gets seeded it's nearly impossible to get rid of and becomes much easier to expand. It makes the scale of East-West/NNEIRI's full-blown ambitions much easier to rationalize, because it'll be existing...not speculative...service to expand out. It'll grease the skids for further investments, like upping the track class/speed limit west of Springfield. And if stretching it out on an installment plan of quick-burst funding helps de-tankify Baker/Pollack's handiwork on East-West, maybe we'll be on our way to getting the grand Vision Thing in some semblance of order at last (Inlands
have to feature first, since Pittsfield is barely worth talking about if we aren't laser-focused on New Haven-Hartford-Springfield-Worcester-Boston ridership above all).