Happy Monday...
Your completely wrong thats why your alone in this sentiment.
Well, I think a few folks have expressed misgivings about the design, materials and vibe of the overall project. I'll let the thread speak for itself - there have been photos of discolored cladding, and weird color choices, and so on. I don't see much point in writing another diatribe about why I feel this project is an unfocused and cartoonish mess. I find the overall aesthetic silly, cheap, and unimaginative. And as I've said elsewhere, I'm completely content to be wrong. And remember, I dislike the look, not what the project does to enhance the streetscape and vastly improve connections between and access to public transportation.
Since the front door is open this is crap now?
My concern here is about safe and comfortable all-weather access to North Station and a reduction in liability (for the developer and the T). In certain weather conditions, I'll bet you a bottle of your favorite sauce that this 40' opening will draw in snow and rain like a Shop-Vac. Others seem to be similarly concerned:
This is an open-air space. It will be subject to blowing snow and require general snow removal, so Delaware North is going to need an aggressive snow & ice strategy to keep the pathways not only clear, but clear to ADA standards.
IMO, it would have been better to enclose the space and have a row of doors at the entry to the street.
Added context:
I remember how the Prudential Center originally had partially open areas similar to this one, but they eventually fully enclosed them due to the cold winds that would blow through much of the year.
And about this point:
It's not comfortable to walk down Causeway Street in those months either, but we don't ask a developer to enclose that.
I think there's a big difference between requiring a developer to seasonally enclose an access point to public transportation in the interest of safety and expecting them to cover a public thoroughfare like Causeway Street. I couldn't care less if this space is heated, only that the floor is free of snow and ice for people who use some sort of mobility device or are traveling with wheeled luggage.
As Saul Bass said: "Design is thinking made visible."
I'd like to know what thinking went into leaving this an open-air space? Why go to the expense of a glass roof, only to skip the possibility of seasonal street-level enclosure? What works in Los Angeles, Sidney, São Paulo, or Cape Town is not necessarily a solution for Boston.