Here are high-resolution renders of the most recent iteration of the towers and street-level:
http://www.tdgarden.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/TheHubOnCauseway-Renderings.pdf
ENJOY!
It would appear they have a movie theater on board!
http://www.prnewswire.com/news-rele...-to-open-new-theater-in-boston-300210594.html
Boston went so long with a relative shortage of full-sized movie theater options on the T. Now we have THREE under construction transit-oriented multi-building mixed-use development projects with movie theaters: Assembly Row, One Seaport Square, and Hub on Causeway.
Boston went so long with a relative shortage of full-sized movie theater options on the T. Now we have THREE under construction transit-oriented multi-building mixed-use development projects with movie theaters: Assembly Row, One Seaport Square, and Hub on Causeway.
I understand the intent of the spire being placed on the north face of the building to "welcome folk" into Boston, but it feels weird to me (like the spire is on the "back of the building) and is ignoring the pedestrian experience on Causeway and inside Boston on the Greenway.
I feel like this positioning would be the equivalent of Atlantic Wharf having placed its spire on the channel side because it would "look better" in postcards, etc versus current positioning that meets the active streetscape below.
Long story short, I'd like to see them move the spire to the south face.
When you count the AMC Boston Common and the Regal Fenway, we will have 5 major, full-sized theaters on the T. Makes one wonder if we really can support all of these theaters.
Why not put complementary spires on both faces?
Regal and Boston Common theaters are disgusting and in desperate need of renovation.
Did someone say two spires?