Are you arguing that putting out free public seating makes a space *less* usable by the public?
It all depends WHERE the seating is. Anyone with eyes can see the clogging up of that "Great Hall". Whoever was expecting to build Trump's wall with Mexico evidently got the contract to furnish this "Connector".
A pedestrian short cut through was the primary selling point to improving the urban experience . By throwing in all those obstacles (plaque in the artery) actually discourages people from using it. There are tons of building lobbies in Boston. Look at the picture.
Why do they put all the obstacles in the MIDDLE of the hall???? They could very easily have put seating, etc. on the sides.
They knew EXACTLY what they were doing by this action (and by not living up to the required by agreement public access hours and days as noted in the Globe article). They're being a bit too cute.
Last edited: