Why do people keep "clutching the pearls" about Bromfield St. for this upcoming project? Yes, the tentative branding/name is 1 Bromfield St., but do you honestly think the project is going to be Bromfield-centric, rather than Washington St.-focused?
It would be insane for the developers not to focus the project's center of gravity/mass onto Washington St., instead of Bromfield. Yes, of course, the Payless building and the City Sports building will be demolitioned. The City Sports building is monumentally sterile and boring, although I respect the concerns for the Payless building, which is kind of charming in its own way.
Again, though, I have to think that 90% of the mass or "face" of this tower is going to be thrust in the direction of Washington St. I doubt there'd even be an entrance on the Bromfield St. side...
... Anyway, I think all can agree that speculation is premature until renderings are released, which I'm sure will be soon.